Literature DB >> 19090634

Endoleaks following endovascular repair of thoracic aortic aneurysm: etiology and outcomes.

Jose P Morales1, Roy K Greenberg, Qingsheng Lu, Marcelo Cury, Adrian V Hernandez, Walid Mohabbat, Michael C Moon, Catherine A Morales, Shona Bathurst, Paul Schoenhagen.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To evaluate the incidence and natural history of endoleaks following thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) of thoracic aortic aneurysm (TAA).
METHODS: A retrospective review was conducted on 200 TAA patients (122 men; mean age 69+/-12 years) who underwent elective TEVAR in the descending thoracic aorta between January 2001 and December 2006. The mean aneurysm diameter was 66 mm (range 50-124), and most (75%) of the aneurysms were atherosclerotic in origin. Medical records and multidetector computed tomography studies were evaluated on a 3-dimensional workstation to categorize endoleak, establish morphological characteristics, and assess outcomes. The outcomes following any secondary interventions were noted in the context of endoleak etiology and the magnitude of the intervention.
RESULTS: Over a mean follow-up of 30 months (range 12-73), 39 (19.5%) patients developed an endoleak (33 primary and 8 secondary); 3 people had 2 distinct types of endoleaks. Endoleaks were associated with the presence of a carotid-subclavian bypass (p = 0.0001) and lengthy aortic coverage by the stent-graft (p = 0.005). The proportion of the 170 patients with a Zenith stent-graft who had an endoleak (17%, n = 39) was significantly lower (p<0.01) than the proportion of endoleaks (34%, n = 10) in the 30 patients with Gore or Talent devices. Secondary interventions for endoleak were performed in 79% of type I, 24% of type II, and 57% of type III endoleaks.
CONCLUSION: In this study, 1 in 5 TAA patients with TEVAR had endoleak. Most type I and III endoleaks required secondary intervention, while conservative treatment was most frequent for type II. Characterization of endoleak type was not always precise, and routine surveillance of all patients with endoleak is recommended.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 19090634     DOI: 10.1583/08-2551.1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Endovasc Ther        ISSN: 1526-6028            Impact factor:   3.487


  6 in total

1.  Tortuosity of the Descending Thoracic Aorta in Patients with Aneurysm and Type B Dissection.

Authors:  Viony M Belvroy; Hector W L de Beaufort; Joost A van Herwaarden; Jean Bismuth; Gabriele Piffaretti; Frans L Moll; Santi Trimarchi
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2020-04       Impact factor: 3.352

2.  Aortic morphometry at endograft position as assessed by 3D image analysis affects risk of type I endoleak formation after TEVAR.

Authors:  Drosos Kotelis; Carolin Brenke; Stefan Wörz; Fabian Rengier; Karl Rohr; Hans-Ulrich Kauczor; Dittmar Böckler; Hendrik von Tengg-Kobligk
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2015-02-22       Impact factor: 3.445

3.  Type IA endoleak embolization after TEVAR via direct transthoracic puncture.

Authors:  Yoshiaki Katada; Shunichi Kondo; Eitoshi Tsuboi; Ken Nakamura; Kyu Rokkaku; Yoshihito Irie
Journal:  Jpn J Radiol       Date:  2015-01-28       Impact factor: 2.374

4.  Hemoptysis as a first symptom of endoleak after thoracic endovascular aortic repair, which caused aortic rupture and required complex management.

Authors:  Tomasz Synowiec; Marcin Warot; Paweł Burchard; Lukasz Paschke; Zuzanna Lysiak; Paweł Chęciński
Journal:  Wideochir Inne Tech Maloinwazyjne       Date:  2013-02-28       Impact factor: 1.195

5.  Multiple multilayer stents for thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm: a possible new tool for aortic endovascular surgery.

Authors:  Valerio Stefano Tolva; Paolo Guy Bianchi; Lea Valeria Cireni; Alma Lombardo; Guido Carlo Keller; Gianfranco Parati; Renato Maria Casana
Journal:  Int J Gen Med       Date:  2012-07-24

Review 6.  Hybrid Approach in Acute and Chronic Aortic Disease.

Authors:  Michele Murzi; Pier Andrea Farneti; Antonio Rizza; Silvia Di Sibio; Cataldo Palmieri; Marco Solinas
Journal:  Medicina (Kaunas)       Date:  2021-12-29       Impact factor: 2.430

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.