Literature DB >> 19089721

Evaluating the effectiveness of curriculum change. Is there a difference between graduating student outcomes from two different curricula?

G Peeraer1, B Y De Winter, A M M Muijtjens, R Remmen, L Bossaert, A J J A Scherpbier.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Changing a curriculum raises the question whether the results, new curriculum student outcomes, are different from old curriculum student outcomes. AIMS: To see whether different curricula produce different outcomes, we compared test and questionnaire results of two cohorts. We wanted to know if there is a difference on knowledge and skills test results, and on the number of times students practiced their skills during their final internships.
METHOD: We used two validated test instruments: the Dutch Progress Test (PT) and the Objective Structured Clinical Examination (OSCE). For reporting their skills practice, we asked students of both cohorts to fill out a basic skills questionnaire.
RESULTS: We found no significant difference between both cohorts on the results of their knowledge test and their report on skills practice. On the OSCE, students from the new curriculum cohort scored significantly higher than old curriculum students.
CONCLUSION: Curriculum change can lead to improvements in graduating students' outcome results.

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19089721     DOI: 10.1080/01421590802512920

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Teach        ISSN: 0142-159X            Impact factor:   3.650


  3 in total

1.  Using the Progress Test Medizin (PTM) for evaluation of the Medical Curriculum Munich (MeCuM).

Authors:  Ralf Schmidmaier; Matthias Holzer; Matthias Angstwurm; Zineb Nouns; Martin Reincke; Martin R Fischer
Journal:  GMS Z Med Ausbild       Date:  2010-11-15

2.  Are recent graduates enough prepared to perform obstetric skills in their rural and compulsory year? A study from Ecuador.

Authors:  Galo Sánchez Del Hierro; Roy Remmen; Veronique Verhoeven; Paul Van Royen; Kristin Hendrickx
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2014-07-31       Impact factor: 2.692

3.  Exploring pooled analysis of pretested items to monitor the performance of medical students exposed to different curriculum designs.

Authors:  Pedro Tadao Hamamoto Filho; Pedro Luiz Toledo de Arruda Lourenção; Joélcio Francisco Abbade; Dario Cecílio-Fernandes; Jacqueline Teixeira Caramori; Angélica Maria Bicudo
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-09-10       Impact factor: 3.240

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.