Literature DB >> 19089497

Flexor tenorrhaphy tensile strength: reduction by cyclic loading: in vitro and ex vivo porcine study.

C E R Gibbons1, D Thompson, M J Sandow.   

Abstract

The integrity of the repair is critical to maintain coaptation of the severed flexor tendon end until healing has advanced sufficiently. In our hospital, we use a modified Savage repair (four-strand Adelaide technique) using 3-0 Ethibond (Ethicon, Somerville, NJ, USA) for acute flexor tenorrhaphy and an active postrepair mobilization protocol. To explain the apparent differences between the theoretical and actual repair strength of a multistrand repair in a single tension test and the reduced strength of a repair subjected to cyclic loading, we compared single and cyclical tensile loading with different suture in vitro configurations of 3-0 Ethibond (Ethicon, Somerville, NJ, USA; one, two, and four strands) and an ex vivo four-strand repair of freshly divided porcine tendon to calculate the ultimate tensile strength (UTS). Mechanical testing was repeated 15 times with both single tensile and cyclical loading for each suture configuration and porcine repair. In the in vitro model, the presence of a knot in a single strand reduced the UTS by 50%. The stiffness of a knotted strand was substantially less than the unknotted strand but became identical after cyclical loading. There was no statistical significance of the UTS between single and cyclical loading with different numbers of strands in this model. In the ex vivo four-strand porcine repair model, there was a significant reduction in UTS with cyclical loading, which equated to the number of strands times the strength of the knotted strand. This discrepancy can be explained by the change in stiffness of the knotted strand after cyclical loading and has important implications for previous studies of suture tendon repair using single tensile loading where the UTS may have been overestimated. We believe that cyclical loading is more representative of physiological loading after acute flexor tendon repair and should be the testing model of choice in suture tenorrhaphy studies.

Entities:  

Year:  2008        PMID: 19089497      PMCID: PMC2686790          DOI: 10.1007/s11552-008-9151-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hand (N Y)        ISSN: 1558-9447


  13 in total

1.  Comparison of zone II flexor tendon repairs using an in vitro linear cyclic testing protocol.

Authors:  G Matheson; S Nicklin; M P Gianoutsous; W R Walsh
Journal:  Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon)       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 2.063

2.  Cyclic stress analysis of flexor tendon repair.

Authors:  D L Pruitt; P R Manske; B Fink
Journal:  J Hand Surg Am       Date:  1991-07       Impact factor: 2.230

3.  Tensile strengths of various suture techniques.

Authors:  M D Shaieb; D I Singer
Journal:  J Hand Surg Br       Date:  1997-12

4.  Intrasynovial flexor tendon repair. An experimental study comparing low and high levels of in vivo force during rehabilitation in canines.

Authors:  M I Boyer; R H Gelberman; M E Burns; H Dinopoulos; R Hofem; M J Silva
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 5.284

5.  Flexor tendon repair in zone II with a new suture technique and an early mobilization program combining passive and active flexion.

Authors:  K L Silfverskiöld; E J May
Journal:  J Hand Surg Am       Date:  1994-01       Impact factor: 2.230

6.  Digital function following flexor tendon repair in Zone II: A comparison of immobilization and controlled passive motion techniques.

Authors:  J W Strickland; S V Glogovac
Journal:  J Hand Surg Am       Date:  1980-11       Impact factor: 2.230

7.  Effect of suture knots on tensile strength of repaired canine flexor tendons.

Authors:  M Aoki; D L Pruitt; H Kubota; P R Manske
Journal:  J Hand Surg Br       Date:  1995-02

8.  Primary flexor tendon repair followed by immediate controlled mobilization.

Authors:  G D Lister; H E Kleinert; J E Kutz; E Atasoy
Journal:  J Hand Surg Am       Date:  1977-11       Impact factor: 2.230

9.  Effect of stress deprivation and cyclic tensile loading on the material and morphologic properties of canine flexor digitorum profundus tendon: an in vitro study.

Authors:  J A Hannafin; S P Arnoczky; A Hoonjan; P A Torzilli
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  1995-11       Impact factor: 3.494

Review 10.  The rupture rate of acute flexor tendon repairs mobilized by the controlled active motion regimen.

Authors:  D Elliot; N S Moiemen; A F Flemming; S B Harris; A J Foster
Journal:  J Hand Surg Br       Date:  1994-10
View more
  4 in total

1.  The Interlocking Modification of the Cross Locked Cruciate Tendon Repair (Modified Adelaide Repair): A Static and Dynamic Biomechanical Assessment.

Authors:  Ramon Tahmassebi; Tim S Peltz; Roger Haddad; Peter Scougall; Mark Gianoutsos; William Walsh
Journal:  J Hand Microsurg       Date:  2014-07-04

Review 2.  Biomechanical comparison of double grasping repair versus cross-locked cruciate flexor tendon repair.

Authors:  C Liam Dwyer; D Dean Dominy; Timothy E Cooney; Richard Englund; Leonard Gordon; John D Lubahn
Journal:  Hand (N Y)       Date:  2015-03

3.  [Suture techniques and material in surgery of flexor tendons].

Authors:  T Pillukat; R Fuhrmann; J Windolf; J van Schoonhoven
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2017-03       Impact factor: 0.955

4.  Beyond the Core Suture: A New Approach to Tendon Repair.

Authors:  Weifeng Zeng; Nicholas J Albano; Ruston J Sanchez; Ronald Mccabe; Ray Vanderby; Samuel O Poore; Aaron M Dingle
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open       Date:  2020-12-17
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.