Literature DB >> 19088227

Health information law in the context of minors.

Sara Rosenbaum1, Susan Abramson, Patricia MacTaggart.   

Abstract

This article presents a legal overview of privacy and autonomy considerations related to children in the context of health information technology adoption and use. All uses of health-related technologies take place within a legal framework that guides health care generally; the privacy laws and autonomy principles long predate health information technology and can be expected to shape its design and use. Furthermore, it is a legal tenet that technology advances shape the law, and this can be expected as health information technology use evolves. Most laws related to health care, medical practice, and the right to privacy are state-based and subject to high variability. As the health information revolution increasingly eliminates the importance of geographic boundaries to health care, interstate tensions can be expected to grow. Health information privacy law is even more complex in the case of children, because the relationship between privacy law and children is itself complex. The law considers minor children to be deserving of special protection against harm and risk exposure, and this concern extends to privacy. Regardless of whether minors can shield health information from parents, it is clear that parents and children have the power to control the flow of information to and among entities. Although information protections may pose a higher standard where information about children is concerned, this fact should not overshadow the extent to which information can be used under existing legal principles. Over time, as the security and safety of information sharing are established, the law may yet evolve to permit a freer flow of information.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19088227     DOI: 10.1542/peds.2008-1755M

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pediatrics        ISSN: 0031-4005            Impact factor:   7.124


  2 in total

1.  Protecting adolescents' right to seek treatment for sexually transmitted diseases without parental consent: the Arizona experience with Senate Bill 1309.

Authors:  Kimberly D Goodwin; Melanie M Taylor; Erin C Fuse Brown; Michelle Winscott; Megan Scanlon; James G Hodge; Tom Mickey; Bob England
Journal:  Public Health Rep       Date:  2012 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.792

2.  Legal, ethical, and financial dilemmas in electronic health record adoption and use.

Authors:  Dean F Sittig; Hardeep Singh
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2011-03-21       Impact factor: 7.124

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.