Literature DB >> 19087458

Food choice and intake: towards a unifying framework of learning and feeding motivation.

J E Day1, I Kyriazakis, P J Rogers.   

Abstract

The food choice and intake of animals (including humans) has typically been studied using frameworks of learning and feeding motivation. When used in isolation such frameworks could be criticized because learning paradigms give little consideration to how new food items are included or excluded from an individual's diet, and motivational paradigms do not explain how individuals decide which food to eat when given a choice. Consequently we are posed with the question of whether individuals actively interact with the food items present in their environment to learn about their nutritional properties? The thesis of this review is that individuals are motivated to actively sample food items in order to assess whether they are nutritionally beneficial or harmful. We offer a unifying framework, centred upon the concept of exploratory motivation, which is a synthesis of learning and paradigms of feeding motivation. In this framework information gathering occurs on two levels through exploratory behaviour: (i) the discrimination of food from nonfood items, and (ii) the continued monitoring and storage of information concerning the nutritional properties of these food items. We expect that this framework will advance our understanding of the behavioural control of nutrient intake by explaining how new food items are identified in the environment, and how individuals are able to monitor changes in the nutritional content of their food resource.

Entities:  

Year:  1998        PMID: 19087458     DOI: 10.1079/NRR19980004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nutr Res Rev        ISSN: 0954-4224            Impact factor:   7.800


  8 in total

1.  Does Bertrand's rule apply to macronutrients?

Authors:  D Raubenheimer; K P Lee; S J Simpson
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2005-11-22       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  Welfare of pigs on farm.

Authors:  Søren Saxmose Nielsen; Julio Alvarez; Dominique Joseph Bicout; Paolo Calistri; Elisabetta Canali; Julian Ashley Drewe; Bruno Garin-Bastuji; Jose Luis Gonzales Rojas; Gortázar Schmidt; Mette Herskin; Virginie Michel; Miguel Ángel Miranda Chueca; Olaf Mosbach-Schulz; Barbara Padalino; Helen Clare Roberts; Karl Stahl; Antonio Velarde; Arvo Viltrop; Christoph Winckler; Sandra Edwards; Sonya Ivanova; Christine Leeb; Beat Wechsler; Chiara Fabris; Eliana Lima; Olaf Mosbach-Schulz; Yves Van der Stede; Marika Vitali; Hans Spoolder
Journal:  EFSA J       Date:  2022-08-25

3.  Down-regulation of honey bee IRS gene biases behavior toward food rich in protein.

Authors:  Ying Wang; Navdeep S Mutti; Kate E Ihle; Adam Siegel; Adam G Dolezal; Osman Kaftanoglu; Gro V Amdam
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2010-04-01       Impact factor: 5.917

4.  Resource distributions affect social learning on multiple timescales.

Authors:  Daniel J van der Post; Bas Ursem; Paulien Hogeweg
Journal:  Behav Ecol Sociobiol       Date:  2009-05-30       Impact factor: 2.980

5.  Consistent proportional macronutrient intake selected by adult domestic cats (Felis catus) despite variations in macronutrient and moisture content of foods offered.

Authors:  Adrian K Hewson-Hughes; Victoria L Hewson-Hughes; Alison Colyer; Andrew T Miller; Simon R Hall; David Raubenheimer; Stephen J Simpson
Journal:  J Comp Physiol B       Date:  2012-12-12       Impact factor: 2.200

6.  Food preferences of similarly raised and kept captive dogs and wolves.

Authors:  Akshay Rao; Friederike Range; Kerstin Kadletz; Kurt Kotrschal; Sarah Marshall-Pescini
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-09-20       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Protein hydrolysates are avoided by herbivores but not by omnivores in two-choice preference tests.

Authors:  Kristin L Field; Alexander A Bachmanov; Julie A Mennella; Gary K Beauchamp; Bruce A Kimball
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2009-01-05       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  The influence of relationships on neophobia and exploration in wolves and dogs.

Authors:  Lucia Moretti; Marleen Hentrup; Kurt Kotrschal; Friederike Range
Journal:  Anim Behav       Date:  2015-09       Impact factor: 2.844

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.