Literature DB >> 19086715

Shoulder muscular demand during lever-activated vs pushrim wheelchair propulsion in persons with spinal cord injury.

Philip Santos Requejo1, Sharon E Lee, Sara J Mulroy, Lisa Lighthall Haubert, Ernest L Bontrager, JoAnne K Gronley, Jacquelin Perry.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND/
OBJECTIVE: The high demand on the upper limbs during manual wheelchair (WC) use contributes to a high prevalence of shoulder pathology in people with spinal cord injury (SCI). Lever-activated (LEVER) WCs have been presented as a less demanding alternative mode of manual WC propulsion. The objective of this study was to evaluate the shoulder muscle electromyographic activity and propulsion characteristics in manual WC users with SCI propelling a standard pushrim (ST) and LEVER WC design.
METHODS: Twenty men with complete injuries (ASIA A or B) and tetraplegia (C6, n = 5; C7, n = 7) or paraplegia (n = 8) secondary to SCI propelled ST and LEVER WCs at 3 propulsion conditions on a stationary ergometer: self-selected free, self-selected fast, and simulated graded resistance. Average velocity, cycle distance, and cadence; median and peak electromyographic intensity; and duration of electromyography of anterior deltoid, pectoralis major, supraspinatus, and infraspinatus muscles were compared between LEVER and ST WC propulsion.
RESULTS: Significant decreases in pectoralis major and supraspinatus activity were recorded during LEVER compared with ST WC propulsion. However, anterior deltoid and infraspinatus intensities tended to increase during LEVER WC propulsion. Participants with tetraplegia had similar or greater anterior deltoid, pectoralis major, and infraspinatus activity for both ST and LEVER WC propulsion compared with the men with paraplegia.
CONCLUSIONS: Use of the LEVER WC reduced and shifted the shoulder muscular demands in individuals with paraplegia and tetraplegia. Further studies are needed to determine the impact of LEVER WC propulsion on long-term shoulder function.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 19086715      PMCID: PMC2607130          DOI: 10.1080/10790268.2008.11754604

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Spinal Cord Med        ISSN: 1079-0268            Impact factor:   1.985


  32 in total

1.  Biomechanical analysis of wheelchair propulsion for various seating positions.

Authors:  L C Mâsse; M Lamontagne; M D O'Riain
Journal:  J Rehabil Res Dev       Date:  1992

2.  Three-dimensional kinematics of wheelchair propulsion.

Authors:  S S Rao; E L Bontrager; J K Gronley; C J Newsam; J Perry
Journal:  IEEE Trans Rehabil Eng       Date:  1996-09

3.  Physiological evaluation of a newly designed lever mechanism for wheelchairs.

Authors:  L H van der Woude; H E Veeger; Y de Boer; R H Rozendal
Journal:  J Med Eng Technol       Date:  1993 Nov-Dec

4.  The rotator cuff opposes superior translation of the humeral head.

Authors:  N A Sharkey; R A Marder
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  1995 May-Jun       Impact factor: 6.202

5.  Adjustment to traumatic spinal cord injury. A longitudinal study of self-reported quality of life.

Authors:  R Stensman
Journal:  Paraplegia       Date:  1994-06

6.  Upper limb function in persons with long term paraplegia and implications for independence: Part II.

Authors:  W E Pentland; L T Twomey
Journal:  Paraplegia       Date:  1994-04

7.  Contractility of muscle during prolonged static and repetitive dynamic activity.

Authors:  H Monod
Journal:  Ergonomics       Date:  1985-01       Impact factor: 2.778

8.  Physical strain in daily life of wheelchair users with spinal cord injuries.

Authors:  T W Janssen; C A van Oers; L H van der Woude; A P Hollander
Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc       Date:  1994-06       Impact factor: 5.411

9.  SMARTWheels: development and testing of a system for measuring manual wheelchair propulsion dynamics.

Authors:  K T Asato; R A Cooper; R N Robertson; J F Ster
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  1993-12       Impact factor: 4.538

10.  Electromyographic activity of shoulder muscles during wheelchair propulsion by paraplegic persons.

Authors:  S J Mulroy; J K Gronley; C J Newsam; J Perry
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  1996-02       Impact factor: 3.966

View more
  3 in total

1.  Comparison of metabolic cost, performance, and efficiency of propulsion using an ergonomic hand drive mechanism and a conventional manual wheelchair.

Authors:  Lisa A Zukowski; Jaimie A Roper; Orit Shechtman; Dana M Otzel; Jason Bouwkamp; Mark D Tillman
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  2013-09-06       Impact factor: 3.966

2.  Manual wheelchair biomechanics while overcoming various environmental barriers: A systematic review.

Authors:  Théo Rouvier; Aude Louessard; Emeline Simonetti; Samuel Hybois; Joseph Bascou; Charles Pontonnier; Hélène Pillet; Christophe Sauret
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-06-23       Impact factor: 3.752

3.  Modifications in Wheelchair Propulsion Technique with Speed.

Authors:  Ian M Russell; Shashank Raina; Philip S Requejo; Rand R Wilcox; Sara Mulroy; Jill L McNitt-Gray
Journal:  Front Bioeng Biotechnol       Date:  2015-10-26
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.