Literature DB >> 19086481

Shifting clinical accountability and the pursuit of quality: aligning clinical and administrative approaches.

Mark J Dobrow1, Terrence Sullivan, Carol Sawka.   

Abstract

This paper presents a narrative review of the literature on clinical accountability, and draws particularly on England's experience establishing "clinical governance" as a base to examine the establishment of a clinical accountability framework for cancer services in Ontario. The review suggests that clinical governance and accountability approaches that actively mesh clinical and administrative approaches at both system and local levels are more likely to be effective in improving quality of care.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 19086481     DOI: 10.1016/S0840-4704(10)60269-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Healthc Manage Forum        ISSN: 0840-4704


  5 in total

1.  Models that work: incorporating quality principles in different clinical settings.

Authors:  Monika K Krzyzanowska; Douglas W Blayney; Linda D Bosserman; Terrence James Sullivan
Journal:  J Oncol Pract       Date:  2013-05       Impact factor: 3.840

2.  Thinking about accountability.

Authors:  Raisa B Deber
Journal:  Healthc Policy       Date:  2014-09

3.  Hospital organizational strategies associated with advanced EHR adoption.

Authors:  A Jay Holmgren; Jessica Phelan; Ashish K Jha; Julia Adler-Milstein
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2021-03-29       Impact factor: 3.402

4.  Accountability in the ontario cancer services system: a qualitative study of system leaders' perspectives.

Authors:  Jessica Bytautas; Mark Dobrow; Terrence Sullivan; Adalsteinn Brown
Journal:  Healthc Policy       Date:  2014-09

Review 5.  What's Measured Is Not Necessarily What Matters: A Cautionary Story from Public Health.

Authors:  Raisa Deber; Robert Schwartz
Journal:  Healthc Policy       Date:  2016-11
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.