Literature DB >> 19086317

Toxicity and bioavailability of copper nanoparticles to the terrestrial plants mung bean (Phaseolus radiatus) and wheat (Triticum aestivum): plant agar test for water-insoluble nanoparticles.

Woo-Mi Lee1, Youn-Joo An, Hyeon Yoon, Hee-Seok Kweon.   

Abstract

Because of their insolubility in water, nanoparticles have a limitation concerning toxicity experiments. The present study demonstrated a plant agar test for homogeneous exposure of nanoparticles to plant species. The effect of Cu nanoparticles on the growth of a plant seedling was studied, and bioaccumulation of nanoparticles was investigated. All tests were conducted in plant agar media to prevent precipitation of water-insoluble nanoparticles in test units. The plant species were Phaseolus radiatus (mung bean) and Triticum aestivum (wheat). Growth inhibition of a seedling exposed to different concentrations of Cu nanoparticles was examined. Copper nanoparticles were toxic to both plants and also were bioavailable. The 2-d median effective concentrations for P. radiatus and T. aestivum exposed to Cu nanoparticles were 335 (95% confidence level, 251-447) and 570 (450-722) mg/L, respectively. Phaseolus radiatus was more sensitive than T. aestivum to Cu nanoparticles. A cupric ion released from Cu nanoparticles had negligible effects in the concentration ranges of the present study, and the apparent toxicity clearly resulted from Cu nanoparticles. Bioaccumulation increased with increasing concentration of Cu nanoparticles, and agglomeration of particles was observed in the cells using transmission-electron microscopy-energy-dispersive spectroscopy. The present study demonstrated that the plant agar test was a good protocol for testing the phytotoxicity of nanoparticles, which are hardly water soluble.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 19086317     DOI: 10.1897/07-481.1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Toxicol Chem        ISSN: 0730-7268            Impact factor:   3.742


  73 in total

1.  Multiple Method Analysis of TiO2 Nanoparticle Uptake in Rice (Oryza sativa L.) Plants.

Authors:  Yingqing Deng; Elijah J Petersen; Katie E Challis; Savelas A Rabb; R David Holbrook; James F Ranville; Bryant C Nelson; Baoshan Xing
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2017-08-25       Impact factor: 9.028

2.  The effects of metallic engineered nanoparticles upon plant systems: An analytic examination of scientific evidence.

Authors:  Thabet Tolaymat; Ash Genaidy; Wael Abdelraheem; Dionysios Dionysiou; Christian Andersen
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2016-11-18       Impact factor: 7.963

Review 3.  Practical considerations for conducting ecotoxicity test methods with manufactured nanomaterials: what have we learnt so far?

Authors:  Richard D Handy; Nico van den Brink; Mark Chappell; Martin Mühling; Renata Behra; Maria Dušinská; Peter Simpson; Jukka Ahtiainen; Awadhesh N Jha; Jennifer Seiter; Anthony Bednar; Alan Kennedy; Teresa F Fernandes; Michael Riediker
Journal:  Ecotoxicology       Date:  2012-03-16       Impact factor: 2.823

4.  Multiwalled carbon nanotubes in alfalfa and wheat: toxicology and uptake.

Authors:  Pola Miralles; Errin Johnson; Tamara L Church; Andrew T Harris
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2012-09-12       Impact factor: 4.118

Review 5.  Myconanotechnology in agriculture: a perspective.

Authors:  Prem Lal Kashyap; Sudheer Kumar; Alok Kumar Srivastava; Arun Kumar Sharma
Journal:  World J Microbiol Biotechnol       Date:  2012-09-22       Impact factor: 3.312

6.  In vitro seed germination and biochemical profiling of Artemisia absinthium exposed to various metallic nanoparticles.

Authors:  Mubashir Hussain; Naveed Iqbal Raja; Zia-Ur-Rehman Mashwani; Muhammad Iqbal; Sidra Sabir; Farhat Yasmeen
Journal:  3 Biotech       Date:  2017-05-30       Impact factor: 2.406

Review 7.  Toxicity of engineered nanoparticles in the environment.

Authors:  Melissa A Maurer-Jones; Ian L Gunsolus; Catherine J Murphy; Christy L Haynes
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  2013-03-07       Impact factor: 6.986

8.  Response difference of transgenic and conventional rice (Oryza sativa) to nanoparticles (γFe₂O₃).

Authors:  Xin Gui; Yingqing Deng; Yukui Rui; Binbin Gao; Wenhe Luo; Shili Chen; Le Van Nhan; Xuguang Li; Shutong Liu; Yaning Han; Liming Liu; Baoshan Xing
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2015-07-09       Impact factor: 4.223

9.  Impact of copper oxide nanoparticles exposure on Arabidopsis thaliana growth, root system development, root lignificaion, and molecular level changes.

Authors:  Prakash M Gopalakrishnan Nair; Ill Min Chung
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2014-06-26       Impact factor: 4.223

10.  Environmental effects of nanosilver: impact on castor seed germination, seedling growth, and plant physiology.

Authors:  Jyothsna Yasur; Pathipati Usha Rani
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2013-05-24       Impact factor: 4.223

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.