Literature DB >> 19086068

Evaluation of distal symmetric polyneuropathy: the role of laboratory and genetic testing (an evidence-based review).

J D England1, G S Gronseth, G Franklin, G T Carter, L J Kinsella, J A Cohen, A K Asbury, K Szigeti, J R Lupski, N Latov, R A Lewis, P A Low, M A Fisher, D Herrmann, J F Howard, G Lauria, R G Miller, M Polydefkis, A J Sumner.   

Abstract

Distal symmetric polyneuropathy (DSP) is the most common variety of neuropathy. Since the evaluation of this disorder is not standardized, the available literature was reviewed to provide evidence-based guidelines regarding the role of laboratory and genetic tests for the assessment of DSP. A literature review using MEDLINE, EMBASE, Science Citation Index, and Current Contents was performed to identify the best evidence regarding the evaluation of polyneuropathy published between 1980 and March 2007. Articles were classified according to a four-tiered level of evidence scheme and recommendations were based on the level of evidence. (1) Screening laboratory tests may be considered for all patients with polyneuropathy (Level C). Those tests that provide the highest yield of abnormality are blood glucose, serum B(12) with metabolites (methylmalonic acid with or without homocysteine), and serum protein immunofixation electrophoresis (Level C). If there is no definite evidence of diabetes mellitus by routine testing of blood glucose, testing for impaired glucose tolerance may be considered in distal symmetric sensory polyneuropathy (Level C). (2) Genetic testing is established as useful for the accurate diagnosis and classification of hereditary neuropathies (Level A). Genetic testing may be considered in patients with cryptogenic polyneuropathy who exhibit a hereditary neuropathy phenotype (Level C). Initial genetic testing should be guided by the clinical phenotype, inheritance pattern, and electrodiagnostic (EDX) features and should focus on the most common abnormalities, which are CMT1A duplication/HNPP deletion, Cx32 (GJB1), and MFN2 mutation screening. There is insufficient evidence to determine the usefulness of routine genetic testing in patients with cryptogenic polyneuropathy who do not exhibit a hereditary neuropathy phenotype (Level U).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19086068     DOI: 10.1002/mus.21226

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Muscle Nerve        ISSN: 0148-639X            Impact factor:   3.217


  16 in total

Review 1.  Inherited neuropathies: clinical overview and update.

Authors:  Christopher J Klein; Xiaohui Duan; Michael E Shy
Journal:  Muscle Nerve       Date:  2013-06-26       Impact factor: 3.217

2.  Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease subtypes and genetic testing strategies.

Authors:  Anita S D Saporta; Stephanie L Sottile; Lindsey J Miller; Shawna M E Feely; Carly E Siskind; Michael E Shy
Journal:  Ann Neurol       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 10.422

3.  An analysis of exome sequencing for diagnostic testing of the genes associated with muscle disease and spastic paraplegia.

Authors:  Cristina Dias; Murat Sincan; Praveen F Cherukuri; Rosemarie Rupps; Yan Huang; Hannah Briemberg; Kathryn Selby; James C Mullikin; Thomas C Markello; David R Adams; William A Gahl; Cornelius F Boerkoel
Journal:  Hum Mutat       Date:  2012-02-28       Impact factor: 4.878

4.  Target-enrichment sequencing and copy number evaluation in inherited polyneuropathy.

Authors:  Wei Wang; Chen Wang; D Brian Dawson; Erik C Thorland; Patrick A Lundquist; Bruce W Eckloff; Yanhong Wu; Saurabh Baheti; Jared M Evans; Steven S Scherer; Peter J Dyck; Christopher J Klein
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  2016-04-13       Impact factor: 9.910

Review 5.  Pharmacological treatment of diabetic neuropathic pain.

Authors:  Howard S Smith; Charles E Argoff
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2011-03-26       Impact factor: 9.546

Review 6.  Germline genetic variants with implications for disease risk and therapeutic outcomes.

Authors:  Amy L Pasternak; Kristen M Ward; Jasmine A Luzum; Vicki L Ellingrod; Daniel L Hertz
Journal:  Physiol Genomics       Date:  2017-09-08       Impact factor: 3.107

Review 7.  [Polyneuropathy in the elderly].

Authors:  Wolfgang Löscher; Bernhard Iglseder
Journal:  Z Gerontol Geriatr       Date:  2017-04-28       Impact factor: 1.281

Review 8.  Diagnosis of Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease.

Authors:  Isabel Banchs; Carlos Casasnovas; Antonia Albertí; Laura De Jorge; Mónica Povedano; Jordi Montero; Juan Antonio Martínez-Matos; Victor Volpini
Journal:  J Biomed Biotechnol       Date:  2009-10-08

9.  Corneal confocal microscopy: a novel means to detect nerve fibre damage in idiopathic small fibre neuropathy.

Authors:  Mitra Tavakoli; Andrew Marshall; Robert Pitceathly; Hassan Fadavi; David Gow; Mark E Roberts; Nathan Efron; Andrew Jm Boulton; Rayaz A Malik
Journal:  Exp Neurol       Date:  2009-09-11       Impact factor: 5.330

10.  Pattern-recognition approach to neuropathy and neuronopathy.

Authors:  Richard J Barohn; Anthony A Amato
Journal:  Neurol Clin       Date:  2013-05       Impact factor: 3.806

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.