Literature DB >> 19085917

A comparison of the mechanical performance characteristics of seven drug-eluting stent systems.

W Schmidt1, P Lanzer, P Behrens, L D T Topoleski, K-P Schmitz.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Mechanical properties of drug eluting stents (DES) will be measured to provide comparable numerical data to assess deliverability, and thus clinical performance.
BACKGROUND: DES are routinely used in coronary interventions to reduce the rates of restenosis and target vessel revascularizations. Current research is primarily concerned with issues related to late stent thrombosis. However, mechanical properties of DES are a critical determinant of deliverability, and consequently the ultimate arbiter of their clinical performance.
METHODS: Mechanical properties (pushability, trackability, crossability) were measured under standardized in-vitro conditions. The vessel models were derived from typical vessel anatomy but adapted to the individual tests. Additionally, profile and bending forces of the stent segment of the delivery system were measured. Seven different commercially available balloon-expandable coronary DES systems were included. All stents were 3.0 mm diameter with a stent length from 14 to 18 mm.
RESULTS: The pushability expressed as the ratio of distal force at a specific proximal push force (4N) ranged between 38.66 and 18.53%. The trackability as the mean track-forces ranged from 0.551 N to 1.137 N. One stent system could not pass this test. The mean crossing forces at a 1.4 mm stenosis model ranged from 0.038 N up to 0.103 N. The mean crimped stent profiles ranged from 1.055 mm to 1.198 mm and the bending stiffness of the crimped stent was 17.22 to 47.20 Nmm2.
CONCLUSION: Better understanding of mechanical properties of DES shall improve tactile skills of the interventionists during PCI and to improve criteria for DES selection in specific clinical settings. Copyright 2009 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19085917     DOI: 10.1002/ccd.21832

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Catheter Cardiovasc Interv        ISSN: 1522-1946            Impact factor:   2.692


  10 in total

Review 1.  Recent developments in drug-eluting stents.

Authors:  Yue Li; Ravinay Bhindi; Levon M Khachigian
Journal:  J Mol Med (Berl)       Date:  2011-01-29       Impact factor: 4.599

Review 2.  Call for standards in technical documentation of intracoronary stents.

Authors:  Peter Lanzer; Frank J H Gijsen; L D Timmie Topoleski; Gerhard A Holzapfel
Journal:  Herz       Date:  2010-02-09       Impact factor: 1.443

Review 3.  The never-ending story of peptide O-xylosyltransferase.

Authors:  I B H Wilson
Journal:  Cell Mol Life Sci       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 9.261

4.  Correlating coating characteristics with the performance of drug-coated balloons--a comparative in vitro investigation of own established hydrogel- and ionic liquid-based coating matrices.

Authors:  Sebastian Kaule; Ingo Minrath; Florian Stein; Udo Kragl; Wolfram Schmidt; Klaus-Peter Schmitz; Katrin Sternberg; Svea Petersen
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-03-03       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Direct comparison of coronary bare metal vs. drug-eluting stents: same platform, different mechanics?

Authors:  Wolfram Schmidt; Peter Lanzer; Peter Behrens; Christoph Brandt-Wunderlich; Alper Öner; Hüseyin Ince; Klaus-Peter Schmitz; Niels Grabow
Journal:  Eur J Med Res       Date:  2018-01-08       Impact factor: 2.175

6.  Clinical outcomes of biodegradable polymer biolimus-eluting BioMatrix stents versus durable polymer everolimus-eluting Xience stents.

Authors:  Da Hyon Lee; Taek Kyu Park; Young Bin Song; Woo Jung Chun; Rak Kyeong Choi; Jin-Ok Jeong; Eul Soon Im; Sang Wook Kim; Joo Myung Lee; Jeong Hoon Yang; Joo-Yong Hahn; Seung-Hyuk Choi; Jin-Ho Choi; Sang Hoon Lee; Hyeon-Cheol Gwon
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-08-10       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Conformability in everolimus-eluting bioresorbable scaffolds compared with metal platform coronary stents in long lesions.

Authors:  Jiang Ming Fam; Yuki Ishibashi; Cordula Felix; Bu Chun Zhang; Roberto Diletti; Nicolas van Mieghem; Evelyn Regar; Ron van Domburg; Yoshinobu Onuma; Robert-Jan van Geuns
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2017-07-06       Impact factor: 2.357

Review 8.  Cardiovascular stents: overview, evolution, and next generation.

Authors:  Setareh Borhani; Shadi Hassanajili; Seyed Hossein Ahmadi Tafti; Shahram Rabbani
Journal:  Prog Biomater       Date:  2018-09-10

9.  In Vitro and In Vivo Comparative Evaluation of a Shellac-Ammonium Paclitaxel-Coated Balloon versus a Benchmark Device.

Authors:  Congying Xia; Yunhan Jiang; Shuangshuang Li; Dan Xiong; Xiaojie Chen; Yufang Chen
Journal:  J Interv Cardiol       Date:  2021-05-25       Impact factor: 2.279

10.  Elastic stent recoil in coronary total occlusions: Comparison of durable-polymer zotarolimus eluting stent and ultrathin strut bioabsorbable-polymer sirolimus eluting stent.

Authors:  Riccardo Improta; Paola Scarparo; Jeroen Wilschut; Quinten Wolff; Joost Daemen; Wijnand K Den Dekker; Felix Zijlstra; Nicolas M Van Mieghem; Roberto Diletti
Journal:  Catheter Cardiovasc Interv       Date:  2021-05-07       Impact factor: 2.585

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.