BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: We studied whether osseointegration and fixation of plasma-sprayed titanium implants grafted with beta-TCP granules (Ossaplast) can be improved by adding an osteogenic signal (Colloss E). The results were compared to implants grafted with fresh frozen morselized allograft with and without the Colloss E device. METHODS: 4 porous-coated Ti implants were placed in the proximal humeri in each of 10 dogs. All implants were surrounded by a 2.5-mm defect, which was grafted with: (A) beta-TCP, (B) beta-TCP+20 mg Colloss E, (C) allograft, or (D) allograft+20 mg Colloss E. The observation time was 4 weeks. RESULTS: Mechanical testing showed that the beta-TCP group with Colloss E was twice as well fixed as the control group grafted with beta-TCP granules alone, and comparable to both allograft groups. We found that every control implant in the beta-TCP grafted group was covered by a dense fibrous membrane. No fibrous tissue was seen in the beta-TCP group augmented with Colloss. These implants were well osseointegrated, with new bone covering 10-25% of the implant surface. Both treated groups had increased graft resorption compared to their respective control groups. Colloss E had no effect on new bone formation or fibrous tissue reduction around the allografted implants. INTERPRETATION: The Colloss E device improved early osseointegration of implants grafted with beta-TCP granules and increased their mechanical implant fixation to the level of allografted implants. The experiment indicates that ceramic bone substitutes may be a viable alternative to allograft when combined with an osteogenic signal such as Colloss E.
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: We studied whether osseointegration and fixation of plasma-sprayed titanium implants grafted with beta-TCP granules (Ossaplast) can be improved by adding an osteogenic signal (Colloss E). The results were compared to implants grafted with fresh frozen morselized allograft with and without the Colloss E device. METHODS: 4 porous-coated Ti implants were placed in the proximal humeri in each of 10 dogs. All implants were surrounded by a 2.5-mm defect, which was grafted with: (A) beta-TCP, (B) beta-TCP+20 mg Colloss E, (C) allograft, or (D) allograft+20 mg Colloss E. The observation time was 4 weeks. RESULTS: Mechanical testing showed that the beta-TCP group with Colloss E was twice as well fixed as the control group grafted with beta-TCP granules alone, and comparable to both allograft groups. We found that every control implant in the beta-TCP grafted group was covered by a dense fibrous membrane. No fibrous tissue was seen in the beta-TCP group augmented with Colloss. These implants were well osseointegrated, with new bone covering 10-25% of the implant surface. Both treated groups had increased graft resorption compared to their respective control groups. Colloss E had no effect on new bone formation or fibrous tissue reduction around the allografted implants. INTERPRETATION: The Colloss E device improved early osseointegration of implants grafted with beta-TCP granules and increased their mechanical implant fixation to the level of allografted implants. The experiment indicates that ceramic bone substitutes may be a viable alternative to allograft when combined with an osteogenic signal such as Colloss E.
Authors: Jorgen Baas; Thomas Jakobsen; Brian Elmengaard; Joan E Bechtold; Kjeld Soballe Journal: J Biomed Mater Res A Date: 2011-10-23 Impact factor: 4.396
Authors: Ben P Hung; Bilal A Naved; Ethan L Nyberg; Miguel Dias; Christina A Holmes; Jennifer H Elisseeff; Amir H Dorafshar; Warren L Grayson Journal: ACS Biomater Sci Eng Date: 2016-04-18