Literature DB >> 19085502

Performance of bone cements: are current preclinical specifications adequate?

Markus Nottrott1, Anders O Mølster, Irene O Moldestad, William R Walsh, Nils R Gjerdet.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Current specifications (standards) for preclinical testing of bone cements (ISO 5833: 2002, ASTM F451-99a) require simple mechanical testing after ageing for 24 h under dry conditions at 23 degrees C. Some bone cements have fulfilled the requirements in the specifications, and yet had inferior clinical results. Clinically, bone cements are subjected to complex loading patterns in a moist or wet environment at 37 degrees C. Thus, both the validity and the robustness of current standard testing protocols can be questioned.
METHODS: We examined the influence of temperature and storage medium on the properties of bone cement. We also compared the results of storage and testing under standard conditions of 23 degrees C in dry air, with the results obtained at 37 degrees C in water or plasma.
RESULTS: The dry specimens showed an increase in strength and elastic modulus with time, while the values of the wet ones decreased. There was no difference between specimens stored in water or in plasma. Ultimate compressive strength of dry specimens after 24 h was 1.16 times higher than that of the ones stored wet, increasing to 1.34 times after 1 month, and 1.46 times after 6 months (p<0.001 for all comparisons).
INTERPRETATION: Testing under dry conditions-as required in current standards-always gave higher values for mechanical properties than did storage and testing under more physiological conditions. The sensitivity of test values to different environments implies that testing conditions for bone cements should be scrutinized in order to develop more relevant testing protocols that reflect the in vivo environment more closely.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 19085502     DOI: 10.1080/17453670810016920

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Orthop        ISSN: 1745-3674            Impact factor:   3.717


  5 in total

1.  Signal-inducing bone cements for MRI-guided spinal cementoplasty: evaluation of contrast-agent-based polymethylmethacrylate cements.

Authors:  Hermann Josef Bail; Christoph Sattig; Serafim Tsitsilonis; Ioannis Papanikolaou; Ulf Karl Mart Teichgräber; Florian Wichlas
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2011-09-09       Impact factor: 2.199

2.  The effect of adding tobramycin to Simplex P cement on femoral stem micromotion as measured by radiostereometric analysis: a 2-year randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Eric Bohm; Martin Petrak; Trevor Gascoyne; Thomas Turgeon
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2012-01-17       Impact factor: 3.717

3.  LbL-assembled gentamicin delivery system for PMMA bone cements to prolong antimicrobial activity.

Authors:  Yazan Al Thaher; Lirong Yang; Steve A Jones; Stefano Perni; Polina Prokopovich
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-12-13       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Clinical Applications of Poly-Methyl-Methacrylate in Neurosurgery: The In Vivo Cranial Bone Reconstruction.

Authors:  Tomaz Velnar; Roman Bosnjak; Lidija Gradisnik
Journal:  J Funct Biomater       Date:  2022-09-19

5.  10-year results of a new low-monomer cement: follow-up of a randomized RSA study.

Authors:  Per Söderlund; Jon Dahl; Stephan Röhrl; Bo Nivbrant; Kjell G Nilsson
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2012-11-01       Impact factor: 3.717

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.