Literature DB >> 19085013

Macroclimate associated with urbanization increases the rate of secondary succession from fallow soil.

K George1, L H Ziska, J A Bunce, B Quebedeaux, J L Hom, J Wolf, J R Teasdale.   

Abstract

To examine the impact of projected climate changes on secondary succession, we exposed the same fallow soil with a common seed bank to an in situ gradient of urban to rural macroenvironments that differed in temperature and CO2 concentration ([CO2]). This gradient was established at three locations: Baltimore city center (urban), a city park on the outskirts of Baltimore (suburban), and an organic farm 87 km from the Baltimore city center site (rural). Over a five-year period, the urban site averaged 2.1 degrees C warmer and had a [CO2] that was ~20% higher than at the rural location, indicating that this gradient was a reasonable surrogate for projected changes in those variables for this century. Previous work had demonstrated that other abiotic variables measured across the transect, including tropospheric ozone and nitrogen deposition, did not differ consistently. The first year of exposure resulted in (two- to threefold) greater aboveground biomass in the urban relative to the rural site, but with uniform species composition across sites. Simple regression of abiotic variables indicated that temperature and vapor pressure deficit (VPD) were the best predictors of plant biomass among locations. Stepwise multiple regressions were also performed to analyze the effect of more than one macroenvironmental variable on total plant biomass. The combination of daily CO2 concentration and nighttime temperature explained 87% (P < 0.01) of the variability in total biomass between sites. After five years, the species demography of the plant communities had changed significantly, with a greater ratio of perennials to annuals for the urban relative to the rural location. Greater first-year biomass and litter accumulation at the urban site may have suppressed the subsequent seed germination of annual species, accelerating changes in species composition. If urban macroenvironments reflect future global change conditions, these data suggest a faster rate of secondary succession in a warmer, higher [CO2] world.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 19085013     DOI: 10.1007/s00442-008-1238-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oecologia        ISSN: 0029-8549            Impact factor:   3.225


  14 in total

1.  Plant diversity enhances ecosystem responses to elevated CO2 and nitrogen deposition.

Authors:  P B Reich; J Knops; D Tilman; J Craine; D Ellsworth; M Tjoelker; T Lee; D Wedin; S Naeem; D Bahauddin; G Hendrey; S Jose; K Wrage; J Goth; W Bengston
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2001-04-12       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  Plant diversity and productivity experiments in european grasslands

Authors:  A Hector; B Schmid; C Beierkuhnlein; M C Caldeira; M Diemer; P G Dimitrakopoulos; J A Finn; H Freitas; P S Giller; J Good; R Harris; P Hogberg; K Huss-Danell; J Joshi; A Jumpponen; C Korner; P W Leadley; M Loreau; A Minns; C P Mulder; G O'Donovan; S J Otway; J S Pereira; A Prinz; D J Read; M Scherer-Lorenzen; E D Schulze; A S D Siamantziouras; E M Spehn; A C Terry; A Y Troumbis; F I Woodward; S Yachi; J H Lawton
Journal:  Science       Date:  1999-11-05       Impact factor: 47.728

3.  Abrupt rise in atmospheric CO2 overestimates community response in a model plant-soil system.

Authors:  John N Klironomos; Michael F Allen; Matthias C Rillig; Jeff Piotrowski; Shokouh Makvandi-Nejad; Benjamin E Wolfe; Jeff R Powell
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2005-02-10       Impact factor: 49.962

4.  Biomass Production in a Tallgrass Prairie Ecosystem Exposed to Ambient and Elevated CO"2.

Authors:  Clenton E Owensby; Patrick I Coyne; Jay M Ham; Lisa M Auen; Alan K Knapp
Journal:  Ecol Appl       Date:  1993-11       Impact factor: 4.657

5.  The response of plants to elevated CO2 : I. Competition among an assemblage of annuals at two levels of soil moisture.

Authors:  F A Bazzaz; R W Carlson
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1984-05       Impact factor: 3.225

6.  Grassland responses to global environmental changes suppressed by elevated CO2.

Authors:  M Rebecca Shaw; Erika S Zavaleta; Nona R Chiariello; Elsa E Cleland; Harold A Mooney; Christopher B Field
Journal:  Science       Date:  2002-12-06       Impact factor: 47.728

7.  What have we learned from 15 years of free-air CO2 enrichment (FACE)? A meta-analytic review of the responses of photosynthesis, canopy properties and plant production to rising CO2.

Authors:  Elizabeth A Ainsworth; Stephen P Long
Journal:  New Phytol       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 10.151

8.  The strategy of ecosystem development.

Authors:  E P Odum
Journal:  Science       Date:  1969-04-18       Impact factor: 47.728

9.  Carbon dioxide enrichment alters plant community structure and accelerates shrub growth in the shortgrass steppe.

Authors:  Jack A Morgan; Daniel G Milchunas; Daniel R LeCain; Mark West; Arvin R Mosier
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2007-09-04       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 10.  Predicting the impact of changing CO(2) on crop yields: some thoughts on food.

Authors:  Lewis H Ziska; James A Bunce
Journal:  New Phytol       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 10.151

View more
  6 in total

Review 1.  Food security and climate change: on the potential to adapt global crop production by active selection to rising atmospheric carbon dioxide.

Authors:  Lewis H Ziska; James A Bunce; Hiroyuki Shimono; David R Gealy; Jeffrey T Baker; Paul C D Newton; Matthew P Reynolds; Krishna S V Jagadish; Chunwu Zhu; Mark Howden; Lloyd T Wilson
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2012-08-08       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  Urban climate modifies tree growth in Berlin.

Authors:  Jens Dahlhausen; Thomas Rötzer; Peter Biber; Enno Uhl; Hans Pretzsch
Journal:  Int J Biometeorol       Date:  2017-12-07       Impact factor: 3.787

Review 3.  Getting ahead of the curve: cities as surrogates for global change.

Authors:  Eleanor C Lahr; Robert R Dunn; Steven D Frank
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2018-07-04       Impact factor: 5.530

4.  Climate change accelerates growth of urban trees in metropolises worldwide.

Authors:  Hans Pretzsch; Peter Biber; Enno Uhl; Jens Dahlhausen; Gerhard Schütze; Diana Perkins; Thomas Rötzer; Juan Caldentey; Takayoshi Koike; Tran van Con; Aurélia Chavanne; Ben du Toit; Keith Foster; Barry Lefer
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-11-13       Impact factor: 4.379

5.  Floristic diversity in different urban ecological niches of a southern European city.

Authors:  Mirko Salinitro; Alessandro Alessandrini; Alessandro Zappi; Dora Melucci; Annalisa Tassoni
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-10-11       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  Urbanization increases floral specialization of pollinators.

Authors:  Sevan Suni; Erin Hall; Evangelina Bahu; Hannah Hayes
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2022-03-07       Impact factor: 2.912

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.