Literature DB >> 19084895

Discharge planning scale: community physicians' perspective.

James F Graumlich1, Karen Grimmer-Somers, Jean C Aldag.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Adverse events occur when patients transition from hospital to outpatient care. For quality improvement and research purposes, clinicians need appropriate, reliable, and valid survey instruments to measure and improve discharge processes.
OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to validate the Modified Physician-PREPARED scale to measure qualities of hospital discharge from the outpatient physician perspective. Descriptions include item development and psychometric properties.
METHODS: The design was a postal survey of outpatient physicians/practitioners who followed 403 patients who were discharged from hospital to home. We mailed questionnaires 10 days after discharge. Questionnaire items assessed perceptions of quality and outcome of discharge planning and communication. Analysis yielded the Modified Physician-PREPARED scale value: the sum of scores from 8 items. Internal consistency and construct validity were assessed.
RESULTS: Survey response rate was 76%. Mean Modified Physician-PREPARED scale value was 16.6 +/- 4.0 with range 8 to 24. High scores reflected high perceptions of discharge quality. Analysis identified 2 principal components: timeliness of communication, and adequacy of discharge plan/transmission. The scale had acceptable internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha 0.86) and construct validity. When considering the discharge planning and communication for a specific patient, outpatient primary care physicians reported higher scores when they were involved in the discharge planning (P < 0.001) and when they were aware of community support services (P = 0.002).
CONCLUSIONS: The Modified Physician-PREPARED scale measured outpatient physician perceptions of quality of hospital discharge to home. Clinicians and researchers may find the scale useful to evaluate discharge processes. (c) 2008 Society of Hospital Medicine.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 19084895     DOI: 10.1002/jhm.371

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Hosp Med        ISSN: 1553-5592            Impact factor:   2.960


  3 in total

1.  Comparing Patients' Opinions on the Hospital Discharge Process Collected With a Self-Reported Questionnaire Completed Via the Internet or Through a Telephone Survey: An Ancillary Study of the SENTIPAT Randomized Controlled Trial.

Authors:  Berengere Couturier; Fabrice Carrat; Gilles Hejblum
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2015-06-24       Impact factor: 5.428

2.  TRialing individualized interventions to prevent functional decline in at-risk older adults (TRIIFL): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial nested in a longitudinal observational study.

Authors:  Karen Grimmer; Julie Luker; Kate Beaton; Saravana Kumar; Alan Crockett; Kay Price
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2013-08-20       Impact factor: 2.279

Review 3.  Measurement tools and outcome measures used in transitional patient safety; a systematic review.

Authors:  Marije A van Melle; Henk F van Stel; Judith M Poldervaart; Niek J de Wit; Dorien L M Zwart
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-06-04       Impact factor: 3.240

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.