Literature DB >> 19084860

Combination of perianal-intrarectal lidocaine-prilocaine cream and periprostatic nerve block for pain control during transrectal ultrasound guided prostate biopsy: a randomized, controlled trial.

Gianluca Giannarini1, Riccardo Autorino, Francesca Valent, Andrea Mogorovich, Francesca Manassero, Maurizio De Maria, Girolamo Morelli, Fabio Barbone, Giuseppe Di Lorenzo, Cesare Selli.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To our knowledge the optimal analgesia during prostate biopsy remains undetermined. We tested the efficacy and safety of combined perianal-intrarectal lidocaine-prilocaine cream and periprostatic nerve block during transrectal ultrasound guided prostate biopsy.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 280 patients were randomized to receive combined perianal-intrarectal lidocaine-prilocaine cream and periprostatic nerve block (group 1), perianal-intrarectal lidocaine-prilocaine cream alone (group 2), periprostatic nerve block alone (group 3) or no anesthesia (group 4) before transrectal ultrasound guided prostate biopsy. Pain was evaluated with a 10-point visual analog scale at subsequent procedural steps, including perianal-intrarectal substance administration, prostate transrectal ultrasound, periprostatic nerve block and sampling. Complications were assessed by self-administered questionnaire and telephone interview.
RESULTS: The groups were comparable in patient age, prostate volume, pathology results and visual analog scale perianal-intrarectal substance administration. Visual analog scale results for transrectal ultrasound were lower in groups 1 and 2 vs 3 and 4 (mean 1.5 and 1.41 vs 5.37 and 5.31, p <0.001) and results for periprostatic nerve block were lower in group 1 vs 3 (mean 1.03 vs 3.74, p <0.001). Results for sampling were lower in groups 1 to 3 vs 4 (mean 0.77, 1.27 and 1.27 vs 4.33, p <0.001) and in group 1 vs 2 and 3 (p <0.001). Stratified analysis showed that visual analog scale sampling was lower in group 1 vs 2 and 3 in patients 65 years old or younger, those with a prostate greater than 49 cc and those with lower anorectal compliance (visual analog scale results for perianal-intrarectal substance administration greater than 2) (p = 0.006, <0.001 and 0.003, respectively). The overall complication rate was similar in all 4 groups (p = 0.87).
CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest that the combination of perianal-intrarectal lidocaine-prilocaine cream and periprostatic nerve block provides better pain control than the 2 modalities alone during the sampling part of transrectal ultrasound guided prostate biopsy with no increase in the complication rate. The magnitude of this effect is higher in younger men, men with a larger prostate and men with lower anorectal compliance.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 19084860     DOI: 10.1016/j.juro.2008.10.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Urol        ISSN: 0022-5347            Impact factor:   7.450


  22 in total

1.  Comparison of two different doses of lidocaine on the pain sensation during transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy.

Authors:  Ferhat Ateş; Furkan Dursun; Ercan Malkoç; Ömer Yılmaz; Hasan Soydan; Hüseyin Şen; Şeref Başal; Fatih Zekey; Kenan Karademir
Journal:  Turk J Urol       Date:  2016-09

2.  Transrectal ultrasound guided prostate biopsy in university of Benin teaching hospital: effect of prostate volume on pain amongst Nigerian patients.

Authors:  Ehiremhen Ozah; Ekene V Ezenwa; Jude O Agbugui; Emmanuel O Osaigbovo
Journal:  Am J Clin Exp Urol       Date:  2021-02-15

3.  Cephalosporins periprostatic injection: are really effective on infections following prostate biopsy?

Authors:  Gianna Pace; Luca Carmignani; Carlo Marenghi; Gabriella Mombelli; Giorgio Bozzini
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2012-03-22       Impact factor: 2.370

4.  Prospective comparison among three intrarectal anesthetic treatments combined with periprostatic nerve block during transrectal ultrasonography-guided prostate biopsy.

Authors:  R A Valdez-Flores; J G Campos-Salcedo; J J Torres-Gomez; A Sedano-Lozano; J Parés-Hipólito; L M Shelton; A Canizalez-Román; M A Valdez-Flores
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2017-11-23       Impact factor: 4.226

5.  Evaluation of the efficacy of a combination of diltiazem and periprostatic nerve block in pain control during transrectal ultrasonography-guided biopsy of the prostate.

Authors:  T Jindal; S N Mandal; G Biswas; D Karmakar
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2013-07       Impact factor: 1.891

6.  Advantages of caudal block over intrarectal local anesthesia plus periprostatic nerve block for transrectal ultrasound guided prostate biopsy.

Authors:  Na Wang; Yaowen Fu; Haichun Ma; Jinguo Wang; Yang Gao
Journal:  Pak J Med Sci       Date:  2016 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 1.088

7.  Comparison of patient comfort between MR-guided in-bore and MRI/ultrasound fusion-guided prostate biopsies within a prospective randomized trial.

Authors:  Christian Arsov; Robert Rabenalt; Michael Quentin; Andreas Hiester; Dirk Blondin; Peter Albers; Gerald Antoch; Lars Schimmöller
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2015-06-09       Impact factor: 4.226

8.  Efficacy and safety of three different analgesic methods for patients undergoing transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy: a prospective, randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  X Ouzounidis; K Moysidis; N Kalinderis; D Papanikolaou; P Koukourikis; E Papaefstathiou; K Hatzimouratidis
Journal:  Hippokratia       Date:  2020 Oct-Dec       Impact factor: 0.471

9.  Pain: easing the pain: local anesthesia for prostate biopsy.

Authors:  Katsuto Shinohara
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 14.432

10.  Efficacy of Periprostatic Anesthesia according to Lidocaine Dose during Transrectal Ultrasound-Guided Biopsy of the Prostate.

Authors:  Kyung Seok Kang; Jeong Kyun Yeo; Min Gu Park; Dae Yeon Cho; Sang Hyun Park; Seok San Park
Journal:  Korean J Urol       Date:  2012-11-14
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.