BACKGROUND: Although amiodarone is one of the most effective pharmacologic agents used in clinical management of atrial fibrillation (AF), little is known about its differential effects in atrial and ventricular myocardium. OBJECTIVES: This study sought to compare the electrophysiological effects of chronic amiodarone in atria and ventricles. METHODS: We compared the electrophysiological characteristics of coronary-perfused atrial and ventricular wedge preparations isolated from untreated and chronic amiodarone-treated dogs (amiodarone, 40 mg/kg/day for 6 weeks, n = 12). RESULTS: Chronic amiodarone prolonged action potential duration (APD(90)) predominantly in atria compared to ventricles and prolonged the effective refractory period (ERP) more than APD(90) in both ventricular and atrial preparations (particularly in the latter) due to the development of postrepolarization refractoriness. Amiodarone reduced dispersion of APD(90) in both atria and ventricles. Although the maximum rate of increase of the action potential upstroke (V(max)) was significantly lower in both atria and ventricles of amiodarone-treated hearts versus untreated controls, the reduction of V(max) was much more pronounced in atria. Amiodarone prolonged P-wave duration more significantly than QRS duration, reflecting greater slowing of conduction in atria versus ventricles. These atrioventricular distinctions were significantly accentuated at faster activation rates. Persistent acetylcholine-mediated AF could be induced in only 1 of 6 atria from amiodarone-treated versus 10 of 10 untreated dogs. CONCLUSION: Our results indicate that under the conditions studied, chronic amiodarone has potent atrial-predominant effects to depress sodium channel-mediated parameters and that this action of the drug is greatly potentiated by its ability to prolong APD predominantly in the atria, thus contributing to its effectiveness to suppress AF.
BACKGROUND: Although amiodarone is one of the most effective pharmacologic agents used in clinical management of atrial fibrillation (AF), little is known about its differential effects in atrial and ventricular myocardium. OBJECTIVES: This study sought to compare the electrophysiological effects of chronic amiodarone in atria and ventricles. METHODS: We compared the electrophysiological characteristics of coronary-perfused atrial and ventricular wedge preparations isolated from untreated and chronic amiodarone-treated dogs (amiodarone, 40 mg/kg/day for 6 weeks, n = 12). RESULTS: Chronic amiodarone prolonged action potential duration (APD(90)) predominantly in atria compared to ventricles and prolonged the effective refractory period (ERP) more than APD(90) in both ventricular and atrial preparations (particularly in the latter) due to the development of postrepolarization refractoriness. Amiodarone reduced dispersion of APD(90) in both atria and ventricles. Although the maximum rate of increase of the action potential upstroke (V(max)) was significantly lower in both atria and ventricles of amiodarone-treated hearts versus untreated controls, the reduction of V(max) was much more pronounced in atria. Amiodarone prolonged P-wave duration more significantly than QRS duration, reflecting greater slowing of conduction in atria versus ventricles. These atrioventricular distinctions were significantly accentuated at faster activation rates. Persistent acetylcholine-mediated AF could be induced in only 1 of 6 atria from amiodarone-treated versus 10 of 10 untreated dogs. CONCLUSION: Our results indicate that under the conditions studied, chronic amiodarone has potent atrial-predominant effects to depress sodium channel-mediated parameters and that this action of the drug is greatly potentiated by its ability to prolong APD predominantly in the atria, thus contributing to its effectiveness to suppress AF.
Authors: Nora Goldschlager; Andrew E Epstein; Gerald V Naccarelli; Brian Olshansky; Bramah Singh; Harold R Collard; Elizabeth Murphy Journal: Heart Rhythm Date: 2007-07-20 Impact factor: 6.343
Authors: Paulus Kirchhof; Hubertus Degen; Michael R Franz; Lars Eckardt; Larissa Fabritz; Peter Milberg; Stephanie Läer; Joachim Neumann; Günter Breithardt; Wilhelm Haverkamp Journal: J Pharmacol Exp Ther Date: 2003-04 Impact factor: 4.030
Authors: Alexander Burashnikov; José M Di Diego; Andrew C Zygmunt; Luiz Belardinelli; Charles Antzelevitch Journal: Circulation Date: 2007-09-04 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Vladislav V Nesterenko; Andrew C Zygmunt; Sridharan Rajamani; Luiz Belardinelli; Charles Antzelevitch Journal: Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol Date: 2011-08-05 Impact factor: 4.733
Authors: Martina Nassif; Sébastien P J Krul; Antoine H G Driessen; Thomas Deneke; Arthur A M Wilde; Jacques M T de Bakker; Joris R de Groot Journal: J Interv Card Electrophysiol Date: 2013-04-16 Impact factor: 1.900