Literature DB >> 19084755

Vascular surgery training in the United States: a half-century of evolution.

Joseph L Mills1.   

Abstract

The purpose of this report is to succinctly review the history, evolution, and accreditation process of postgraduate surgical training programs in the United States, with emphasis on recent dramatic changes in vascular surgery training. Vascular surgery became a distinct specialty of surgery on March 17, 2005, when the American Board of Surgery (ABS) received approval from the American Board of Medical Specialties (ABMS) to offer a Primary Certificate in Vascular Surgery. The traditional requirement for 5 years of training and certification in general surgery was eliminated. Effective July 1, 2006, the ABS converted its certificate in vascular surgery from a subspecialty certificate to a specialty (primary) certificate. These landmark changes allowed the simultaneous development of new training paradigms. Multiple flexible training pathways leading to either dual certification (Traditional 5-2; Early Specialization Program 4-2) or vascular surgery certification alone (Integrated 0-5; Independent 3-3) now exist. New pathways require a minimum of 2 years of core surgery training and 3 years of advanced vascular training. There are currently 96 accredited traditional 5-2 programs, five 4-2 programs, and 11 0-5 integrated programs, with multiple additional institutions in the process of submitting 0-5 applications. The main obstacle preventing more rapid transition to the new pathways seems to be difficulty in obtaining funding for additional resident positions. Multiple flexible training paradigms are likely to coexist as vascular surgery continues to evolve.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 19084755     DOI: 10.1016/j.jvs.2008.07.090

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vasc Surg        ISSN: 0741-5214            Impact factor:   4.268


  4 in total

1.  Trends in a changing vascular practice environment for members of the Society for Vascular Surgery.

Authors:  Mika A B Matthews; Bhagwan Satiani; Joann M Lohr
Journal:  J Vasc Surg       Date:  2012-12-17       Impact factor: 4.268

2.  Comparison of Patient Outcomes Among Integrated Residency Versus Fellowship-Trained Vascular Surgeons.

Authors:  Brigitte K Smith; Samuel R G Finlayson; Bruce A Perler; Angela P Presson; Chelsea M Allen; Benjamin S Brooke
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2020-12-18       Impact factor: 13.787

Review 3.  Artificial vascular models for endovascular training (3D printing).

Authors:  Inez Torres; Nelson De Luccia
Journal:  Innov Surg Sci       Date:  2018-08-11

4.  Effect of vascular simulation training on practice performance in residents: a retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  Lin Yang; Yanzi Li; Jianlin Liu; Yamin Liu
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2020-09-21       Impact factor: 2.692

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.