Literature DB >> 19084186

Biomechanical study of cross-locked cruciate versus Strickland flexor tendon repair.

Mordechai Vigler1, Ram Palti, Rachel Goldstein, Vipul P Patel, Phillip Nasser, Steve K Lee.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Zone II flexor tendon repairs may create a bulging effect with resistance to tendon gliding. A biomechanical study was performed comparing the 4-strand cross-locked cruciate (CLC) to a 4-strand Strickland repair, both with and without an interlocking horizontal mattress (IHM) suture, in terms of strength characteristics and work of flexion.
METHODS: Sixteen fresh-frozen human fingers were placed in a custom jig. Flexor digitorum profundus tendons were sectioned at the A3 pulley level. Fingers were separated into 2 repair groups: 4-strand CLC and 4-strand Strickland core suture. Work of flexion was determined for each group, with and without an IHM circumferential suture. Final repair including IHM was tested for 2-mm gap failure and ultimate load to failure.
RESULTS: The CLC-IHM had a significantly smaller increase in work of flexion than the Strickland-IHM. For both suture types, the circumferential suture resulted in a statistically significant increase in work of flexion; however, peak entry force produced upon entry of the repair into the A2 pulley was reduced, although the decrease was not statistically significant for each group. The CLC-IHM had a significantly higher ultimate load to failure.
CONCLUSIONS: (1) The CLC-IHM suture method is stronger with less work of flexion than the Strickland-IHM method. (2) This new, combination repair method of CLC core suture with IHM circumferential suture is biomechanically superior to the commonly performed Strickland-IHM technique.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 19084186     DOI: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2008.07.009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Hand Surg Am        ISSN: 0363-5023            Impact factor:   2.230


  6 in total

1.  The Interlocking Modification of the Cross Locked Cruciate Tendon Repair (Modified Adelaide Repair): A Static and Dynamic Biomechanical Assessment.

Authors:  Ramon Tahmassebi; Tim S Peltz; Roger Haddad; Peter Scougall; Mark Gianoutsos; William Walsh
Journal:  J Hand Microsurg       Date:  2014-07-04

2.  The Effect of the Epitendinous Suture on Gliding in a Cadaveric Model of Zone II Flexor Tendon Repair.

Authors:  Zaneb Yaseen; Christopher English; Spencer J Stanbury; Tony Chen; Susan Messing; Hani Awad; John C Elfar
Journal:  J Hand Surg Am       Date:  2015-04-25       Impact factor: 2.230

3.  Impact of Smad3 loss of function on scarring and adhesion formation during tendon healing.

Authors:  Evan B Katzel; Matthew Wolenski; Alayna E Loiselle; Patrick Basile; Lisa M Flick; Howard N Langstein; Matthew J Hilton; Hani A Awad; Warren C Hammert; Regis J O'Keefe
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  2010-09-14       Impact factor: 3.494

4.  Repair of flexor tendon injuries by four strands cruciate technique versus two strands kessler technique.

Authors:  Alaa A Dawood
Journal:  J Clin Orthop Trauma       Date:  2020-06-03

5.  Eight-strand Cross-locked Cruciate Flexor Tendon Repair Using Double-stranded Suture: A Description of the Surgical Technique.

Authors:  Kentaro Watanabe; Hideyuki Ota; Hiroshi Sasaki
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open       Date:  2016-11-07

6.  Biomechanical comparison of the four-strand cruciate and Strickland techniques in animal tendons.

Authors:  Raquel Bernardelli Iamaguchi; William Villani; Marcelo Rosa Rezende; Teng Hsiang Wei; Alvaro B Cho; Gustavo Bispo dos Santos; Rames Mattar
Journal:  Clinics (Sao Paulo)       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 2.365

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.