Literature DB >> 19084117

The use of intraosseous anesthesia among endodontists: results of a questionnaire.

Chad Bangerter1, Pete Mines, Mark Sweet.   

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to investigate the use of supplemental intraosseous (IO) anesthesia among endodontists in the United States. The study also looked at the types of anesthetic solutions commonly used for IO anesthesia and in which diagnostic conditions IO anesthesia is used. A Web-based survey of 2,528 active members of the American Association of Endodontists was sent out by e-mail. Data from 833 respondents were collected with a response rate of 33%. It was discovered that 94.77% of the respondents used some form of IO anesthesia, with the periodontal ligament injection (PDL) being the most commonly administered (49.78%). Symptomatic irreversible pulpitis is the pulpal diagnosis for which respondents most often use some form of IO anesthesia (61.99%), and 2% lidocaine with epinephrine 1:100,000 is the most common anesthetic solution used in IO anesthesia (37.62%). Although more than half of the respondents use some form of IO anesthesia more than twice a week, newer IO anesthesia delivery systems such as Stabident (Fairfax Dental, San Francisco, CA) and X-Tip (Dentsply International, Johnson City, TN) are used less often than the PDL injection.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 19084117     DOI: 10.1016/j.joen.2008.10.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Endod        ISSN: 0099-2399            Impact factor:   4.171


  7 in total

Review 1.  Anatomy of sodium hypochlorite accidents involving facial ecchymosis - a review.

Authors:  Wan-chun Zhu; Jacqueline Gyamfi; Li-na Niu; G John Schoeffel; Si-ying Liu; Filippo Santarcangelo; Sara Khan; Kelvin C-Y Tay; David H Pashley; Franklin R Tay
Journal:  J Dent       Date:  2013-08-28       Impact factor: 4.379

2.  Efficacy and safety of intraseptal and periodontal ligament anesthesia achieved by computer-controlled articaine + epinephrine delivery: a dose-finding study.

Authors:  Vladimir Biocanin; Bozidar Brkovic; Biljana Milicic; Dragica Stojic
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2012-04-25       Impact factor: 3.573

3.  Levobupivacaine vs. bupivacaine for third molar surgery: quality of anaesthesia, postoperative analgesia and local vascular effects.

Authors:  Denis Brajkovic; Bozidar Brkovic; Marija Milic; Vladimir Biocanin; Elena Krsljak; Dragica Stojic
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2013-10-06       Impact factor: 3.573

4.  Anaesthetic Efficacy of 4% Articaine in Comparison with 2% Lidocaine as Intraligamentary Injections after an Ineffective Inferior Alveolar Nerve Block in Mandibular Molars with Irreversible Pulpitis: A Prospective Randomised Triple-Blind Clinical Trial.

Authors:  Nazanin Zargar; Elnaz Shooshtari; Leila Pourmusavi; Alireza Akbarzadeh Baghban; Hengameh Ashraf; Ardavan Parhizkar
Journal:  Pain Res Manag       Date:  2021-05-11       Impact factor: 3.037

Review 5.  Various strategies for pain-free root canal treatment.

Authors:  Masoud Parirokh; Paul V Abbott
Journal:  Iran Endod J       Date:  2013-12-24

6.  Comparison of the Anaesthesia Success Rate in Maxillary First and Second Molars with 3% Prilocaine as the Anaesthetic Agent.

Authors:  Masoud Parirokh; Iman Samadi; Nouzar Nakhaee; Paul Abbott
Journal:  Eur Endod J       Date:  2021-12

7.  Root damage induced by intraosseous anesthesia. An in vitro investigation.

Authors:  Christian Graetz; Karim-Mohamed Fawzy-El-Sayed; Nicole Graetz; Christof-Edmund Dörfer
Journal:  Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal       Date:  2013-01-01
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.