Literature DB >> 19083753

Forensic validation of the SNPforID 52-plex assay.

Esther Musgrave-Brown1, David Ballard, Kinga Balogh, Klaus Bender, Burkhard Berger, Magdalena Bogus, Claus Børsting, María Brion, Manuel Fondevila, Cheryl Harrison, Ceylan Oguzturun, Walther Parson, Chris Phillips, Carsten Proff, Eva Ramos-Luis, Juan J Sanchez, Paula Sánchez Diz, Bea Sobrino Rey, Beate Stradmann-Bellinghausen, Catherine Thacker, Angel Carracedo, Niels Morling, Richard Scheithauer, Peter M Schneider, Denise Syndercombe Court.   

Abstract

The advantages of single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) typing in forensic genetics are well known and include a wider choice of high-throughput typing platforms, lower mutation rates, and improved analysis of degraded samples. However, if SNPs are to become a realistic supplement to current short tandem repeat (STR) typing methods, they must be shown to successfully and reliably analyse the challenging samples commonly encountered in casework situations. The European SNPforID consortium, supported by the EU GROWTH programme, has developed a multiplex of 52 SNPs for forensic analysis, with the amplification of all 52 loci in a single reaction followed by two single base extension (SBE) reactions which are detected with capillary electrophoresis. In order to validate this assay, a variety of DNA extracts were chosen to represent problems such as low copy number and degradation that are commonly seen in forensic casework. A total of 40 extracts were used in the study, each of which was sent to two of the five participating laboratories for typing in duplicate or triplicate. Laboratories were instructed to carry out their analyses as if they were dealing with normal casework samples. Results were reported back to the coordinating laboratory and compared with those obtained from traditional STR typing of the same extracts using Powerplex 16 (Promega). These results indicate that, although the ability to successfully type good quality, low copy number extracts is lower, the 52-plex SNP assay performed better than STR typing on degraded samples, and also on samples that were both degraded and of limited quantity, suggesting that SNP analysis can provide advantages over STR analysis in forensically relevant circumstances. However, there were also additional problems arising from contamination and primer quality issues and these are discussed.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 19083753     DOI: 10.1016/j.fsigen.2007.01.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Forensic Sci Int Genet        ISSN: 1872-4973            Impact factor:   4.882


  16 in total

1.  Selection of 29 highly informative InDel markers for human identification and paternity analysis in Chinese Han population by the SNPlex genotyping system.

Authors:  Chengtao Li; Suhua Zhang; Li Li; Jingzhong Chen; Yan Liu; Shumin Zhao
Journal:  Mol Biol Rep       Date:  2011-06-18       Impact factor: 2.316

2.  Massively parallel sequencing of forensically relevant single nucleotide polymorphisms using TruSeq™ forensic amplicon.

Authors:  David H Warshauer; Carey P Davis; Cydne Holt; Yonmee Han; Paulina Walichiewicz; Tom Richardson; Kathryn Stephens; Anne Jager; Jonathan King; Bruce Budowle
Journal:  Int J Legal Med       Date:  2014-11-19       Impact factor: 2.686

3.  Potential relationship between single nucleotide polymorphisms used in forensic genetics and diseases or other traits in European population.

Authors:  Maria Pombar-Gomez; Elixabet Lopez-Lopez; Idoia Martin-Guerrero; Africa Garcia-Orad Carles; Marian M de Pancorbo
Journal:  Int J Legal Med       Date:  2015-03-13       Impact factor: 2.686

Review 4.  Back to the Future - Part 2. Post-mortem assessment and evolutionary role of the bio-medicolegal sciences.

Authors:  Santo Davide Ferrara; Giovanni Cecchetto; Rossana Cecchi; Donata Favretto; Silke Grabherr; Takaki Ishikawa; Toshikazu Kondo; Massimo Montisci; Heidi Pfeiffer; Maurizio Rippa Bonati; Dina Shokry; Marielle Vennemann; Thomas Bajanowski
Journal:  Int J Legal Med       Date:  2017-04-25       Impact factor: 2.686

Review 5.  Forensically relevant SNaPshot® assays for human DNA SNP analysis: a review.

Authors:  Bhavik Mehta; Runa Daniel; Chris Phillips; Dennis McNevin
Journal:  Int J Legal Med       Date:  2016-11-14       Impact factor: 2.686

6.  Kinship Analysis with Diallelic SNPs - Experiences with the SNPforID Multiplex in an ISO17025 Accreditated Laboratory.

Authors:  Claus Børsting; Martin Mikkelsen; Niels Morling
Journal:  Transfus Med Hemother       Date:  2012-05-12       Impact factor: 3.747

7.  SNPs as Supplements in Simple Kinship Analysis or as Core Markers in Distant Pairwise Relationship Tests: When Do SNPs Add Value or Replace Well-Established and Powerful STR Tests?

Authors:  Christopher Phillips; Manuel García-Magariños; Antonio Salas; Angel Carracedo; Maria Victoria Lareu
Journal:  Transfus Med Hemother       Date:  2012-05-12       Impact factor: 3.747

8.  Beyond STRs: The Role of Diallelic Markers in Forensic Genetics.

Authors:  Peter M Schneider
Journal:  Transfus Med Hemother       Date:  2012-05-15       Impact factor: 3.747

9.  Development of a forensic identity SNP panel for Indonesia.

Authors:  Daniel Augustinus; Michelle E Gahan; Dennis McNevin
Journal:  Int J Legal Med       Date:  2014-08-08       Impact factor: 2.686

10.  High-throughput SNP-based authentication of human cell lines.

Authors:  Felipe Castro; Wilhelm G Dirks; Silke Fähnrich; Agnes Hotz-Wagenblatt; Michael Pawlita; Markus Schmitt
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  2012-06-28       Impact factor: 7.396

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.