Literature DB >> 19083724

Towards understanding the effect of uncertainty in the number of contributors to DNA stains.

John S Buckleton1, James M Curran, Peter Gill.   

Abstract

DNA evidence recovered from a scene or collected in relation to a case is generally declared as a mixture when more than two alleles are observed at several loci. However, in principle, all DNA profiles may be considered to be potentially mixtures, even those that show not more than two alleles at any locus. When using a likelihood ratio approach to the interpretation of mixed DNA profiles it is necessary to postulate the number of potential contributors. However, this number is never known with certainty. The possibility of a, say three-person mixture, presenting four or fewer peaks at each locus of the CODIS set was explored by Paoletti et al. [D.R. Paoletti, T.E. Doom, C.M. Krane, M.L. Raymer, D.E. Krane, Empirical analysis of the STR profiles resulting from conceptual mixtures, J. Forensic Sci. 50 (2005) 1361-1366]. In this work we extend this analysis to consider the profiler plus and SGM plus multiplices. We begin the assessment of the risk associated with current practice in the calculation of LR's. We open the discussion of possible ways to surmount this ambiguity.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 19083724     DOI: 10.1016/j.fsigen.2006.09.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Forensic Sci Int Genet        ISSN: 1872-4973            Impact factor:   4.882


  7 in total

1.  On the exact distribution of the numbers of alleles in DNA mixtures.

Authors:  Torben Tvedebrink
Journal:  Int J Legal Med       Date:  2013-12-14       Impact factor: 2.686

2.  Consensus and pool profiles to assist in the analysis and interpretation of complex low template DNA mixtures.

Authors:  Corina Benschop; Hinda Haned; Titia Sijen
Journal:  Int J Legal Med       Date:  2011-12-01       Impact factor: 2.686

3.  Estimating the number of contributors to two-, three-, and four-person mixtures containing DNA in high template and low template amounts.

Authors:  Jaheida Perez; Adele A Mitchell; Nubia Ducasse; Jeannie Tamariz; Theresa Caragine
Journal:  Croat Med J       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 1.351

4.  Uncertainty in estimating the number of contributors from simulated DNA mixture profiles, with and without allele dropout, from Chinese, Malay, Indian, and Caucasian ethnic populations.

Authors:  Kevin Wai Yin Chong; Christopher Kiu-Choong Syn
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-03-04       Impact factor: 4.996

Review 5.  A Review of Probabilistic Genotyping Systems: EuroForMix, DNAStatistX and STRmix™.

Authors:  Peter Gill; Corina Benschop; John Buckleton; Øyvind Bleka; Duncan Taylor
Journal:  Genes (Basel)       Date:  2021-09-30       Impact factor: 4.096

6.  Internal Validation of MaSTR™ Probabilistic Genotyping Software for the Interpretation of 2-5 Person Mixed DNA Profiles.

Authors:  Michael S Adamowicz; Taylor N Rambo; Jennifer L Clarke
Journal:  Genes (Basel)       Date:  2022-08-11       Impact factor: 4.141

7.  Current developments in forensic interpretation of mixed DNA samples (Review).

Authors:  Na Hu; Bin Cong; Shujin Li; Chunling Ma; Lihong Fu; Xiaojing Zhang
Journal:  Biomed Rep       Date:  2014-01-28
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.