OBJECTIVES: Individual activities of N-acetyltransferase 2 (NAT2) and of xanthine oxidase (XO) can be assessed using ratios of urinary caffeine metabolites. We investigated how ratios changed over time and which urine collection interval would be the best for NAT2 and XO activity assessments. METHODS: On two occasions separated by 14 days, 16 healthy male Caucasians collected urine before and 0-2, 2-4, 4-6, 6-8, 8-12, 12-16 and 16-24 h after a dose of 150 mg caffeine given in the framework of a phenotyping cocktail study. The metabolites 5-acetylamino-6-formylamino-3-methyluracil (AFMU), 5-acetylamino-6-amino-3-methyluracil (AAMU), 1-methylxanthine (1X), and 1-methylurate (1U) were quantified with LC-MS/MS. The molar ratio (AFMU + AAMU)/(1X + 1U + AFMU + AAMU) was used as a NAT2 metric, while the ratio 1U/(1X + 1U) served as XO metric. RESULTS: The NAT2 ratios were stable in the intervals 4-24 h after caffeine dosing. Mean intra-individual coefficients of variation were 11-23% starting 4 h post-dose, while inter-individual variability reached 37-75%. The XO ratios increased gradually by 14% from the 2-4 to the 16-24 h interval. The mean intra- and inter-individual coefficients of variation of XO activity were 3-18 and 7-10% respectively. No significant differences between study occasions were observed. CONCLUSIONS: Any sampling interval at least 4 h after caffeine dosing is suitable for NAT2 and XO activity assessments. XO activities can only be compared between volunteers and studies if the same urine collection schedule has been respected. The low intraindividual variability allows for sample sizes of 16 and 6 participants in crossover interaction studies of NAT2 and XO activity respectively.
OBJECTIVES: Individual activities of N-acetyltransferase 2 (NAT2) and of xanthine oxidase (XO) can be assessed using ratios of urinary caffeine metabolites. We investigated how ratios changed over time and which urine collection interval would be the best for NAT2 and XO activity assessments. METHODS: On two occasions separated by 14 days, 16 healthy male Caucasians collected urine before and 0-2, 2-4, 4-6, 6-8, 8-12, 12-16 and 16-24 h after a dose of 150 mg caffeine given in the framework of a phenotyping cocktail study. The metabolites 5-acetylamino-6-formylamino-3-methyluracil (AFMU), 5-acetylamino-6-amino-3-methyluracil (AAMU), 1-methylxanthine (1X), and 1-methylurate (1U) were quantified with LC-MS/MS. The molar ratio (AFMU + AAMU)/(1X + 1U + AFMU + AAMU) was used as a NAT2 metric, while the ratio 1U/(1X + 1U) served as XO metric. RESULTS: The NAT2 ratios were stable in the intervals 4-24 h after caffeine dosing. Mean intra-individual coefficients of variation were 11-23% starting 4 h post-dose, while inter-individual variability reached 37-75%. The XO ratios increased gradually by 14% from the 2-4 to the 16-24 h interval. The mean intra- and inter-individual coefficients of variation of XO activity were 3-18 and 7-10% respectively. No significant differences between study occasions were observed. CONCLUSIONS: Any sampling interval at least 4 h after caffeine dosing is suitable for NAT2 and XO activity assessments. XO activities can only be compared between volunteers and studies if the same urine collection schedule has been respected. The low intraindividual variability allows for sample sizes of 16 and 6 participants in crossover interaction studies of NAT2 and XO activity respectively.
Authors: Siwaporn Chainuvati; Anne N Nafziger; J Steven Leeder; Andrea Gaedigk; Gregory L Kearns; Edward Sellers; Yanhua Zhang; Angela D M Kashuba; Elizabeth Rowland; Joseph S Bertino Journal: Clin Pharmacol Ther Date: 2003-11 Impact factor: 6.875
Authors: Peter E Haroldsen; Marvin R Garovoy; Donald G Musson; Huiyu Zhou; Laurie Tsuruda; Boyd Hanson; Charles A O'Neill Journal: Pharmacol Res Perspect Date: 2014-12-09
Authors: Hyeong Jun Kim; Min Sun Choi; Shaheed Ur Rehman; Young Seok Ji; Jun Sang Yu; Katsunori Nakamura; Hye Hyun Yoo Journal: Nutrients Date: 2019-08-19 Impact factor: 5.717
Authors: Qiuying Chen; Ruba S Deeb; Yuliang Ma; Michelle R Staudt; Ronald G Crystal; Steven S Gross Journal: PLoS One Date: 2015-12-16 Impact factor: 3.240