Literature DB >> 19081661

From 'silent' to 'heard': professional mediation, manipulation and women's experiences of their body after an abnormal Pap smear.

Karin Blomberg1, Anette Forss, Britt-Marie Ternestedt, Carol Tishelman.   

Abstract

While there is a large body of research on cervical cancer screening, fewer studies address the experiences of women receiving abnormal Pap smear results after routine screening. Those studies highlighting such experiences tend to concentrate on resulting psychosocial distress, with an absence in the literature about women's experiences of their bodies during medical follow-up for dysplasia, and no studies were found that explore such experiences over time. In this article, we focus on bodily experiences over time during medical follow-up of an abnormal Pap smear among a group of women in Sweden. This qualitative analysis is based on interview data from a total of 30 women, and with in-depth analysis of the content of 34 transcribed interviews with nine women who were followed longitudinally. We found that medical follow-up involved an experience of both "having" and "being" a body, which changed over time. Women described a process that ranged from having a cervix that was neither felt, 'heard', nor seen, to having a body that became known to them first indirectly through professional mediation and later through direct experience after professional manipulation. The conceptualization of bodily boundaries appeared to change, e.g. through visualization of the previously unfamiliar cervix, pain, vaginal discharge, and bleeding, as well as linkages to the bodies of women in their extended families through the generations. Thus, bodily experiences appear to be an intrinsic part of medical follow-up of an abnormal Pap smear through which health, disease, and risks in the past, present, and future were reconceptualised.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 19081661     DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2008.11.007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Soc Sci Med        ISSN: 0277-9536            Impact factor:   4.634


  3 in total

Review 1.  Factors in quality care--the case of follow-up to abnormal cancer screening tests--problems in the steps and interfaces of care.

Authors:  Jane Zapka; Stephen H Taplin; Rebecca Anhang Price; Caroline Cranos; Robin Yabroff
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr       Date:  2010

Review 2.  The sociology of cancer: a decade of research.

Authors:  Anne Kerr; Emily Ross; Gwen Jacques; Sarah Cunningham-Burley
Journal:  Sociol Health Illn       Date:  2018-02-15

3.  Women's perspectives on illness when being screened for cervical cancer.

Authors:  Lise Hounsgaard; Mikaela Augustussen; Helle Møller; Stephen K Bradley; Suzanne Møller
Journal:  Int J Circumpolar Health       Date:  2013-08-05       Impact factor: 1.228

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.