Literature DB >> 19081648

The dynamical information underpinning anticipation skill.

A Mark Williams1, Raoul Huys, Rouwen Cañal-Bruland, Norbert Hagemann.   

Abstract

We examined the mechanisms underpinning anticipation of ground strokes in tennis by perturbing the dynamical information presented at different body regions (+ racket). We interchanged the dynamics at selected regions with those from strokes played to the opposite side of the court. Skilled and less skilled tennis players were required to anticipate stroke direction when presented with filmed sequences in stick figure format. There was a significant Skill x Condition interaction. Skilled players reported lower accuracy scores when both proximal (i.e., shoulders, hips, and legs) and distal (i.e., arm + racket) cues were interchanged, whereas the less skilled players showed a significant decrement only in the arm+racket condition. Findings suggest that skilled players rely on a more 'global' than 'local' perceptual strategy. The greatest decrement in performance and lowest response accuracy scores were reported in the arm + racket condition, highlighting the importance of end-effector information when anticipating opponents' intentions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 19081648     DOI: 10.1016/j.humov.2008.10.006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Mov Sci        ISSN: 0167-9457            Impact factor:   2.161


  19 in total

1.  Prediction of human actions: expertise and task-related effects on neural activation of the action observation network.

Authors:  Nils Balser; Britta Lorey; Sebastian Pilgramm; Rudolf Stark; Matthias Bischoff; Karen Zentgraf; Andrew Mark Williams; Jörn Munzert
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2014-01-22       Impact factor: 5.038

2.  The relationship between action anticipation and emotion recognition in athletes of open skill sports.

Authors:  Yu-Ling Shih; Chia-Yen Lin
Journal:  Cogn Process       Date:  2016-05-09

3.  Athletes and novices are differently capable to recognize feint and non-feint actions.

Authors:  Iris Güldenpenning; Andreas Steinke; Dirk Koester; Thomas Schack
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2013-08-18       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Recognition of tennis serve performed by a digital player: comparison among polygon, shadow, and stick-figure models.

Authors:  Hirofumi Ida; Kazunobu Fukuhara; Motonobu Ishii
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-03-16       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  The influence of expertise on brain activation of the action observation network during anticipation of tennis and volleyball serves.

Authors:  Nils Balser; Britta Lorey; Sebastian Pilgramm; Tim Naumann; Stefan Kindermann; Rudolf Stark; Karen Zentgraf; A Mark Williams; Jörn Munzert
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2014-08-01       Impact factor: 3.169

6.  Intention understanding over T: a neuroimaging study on shared representations and tennis return predictions.

Authors:  Stephanie Cacioppo; Frederic Fontang; Nisa Patel; Jean Decety; George Monteleone; John T Cacioppo
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2014-10-06       Impact factor: 3.169

7.  The Effect of Sport Practice on Enhanced Cognitive Processing of Bodily Indices: A Study on Volleyball Players and Their Ability to Predict Hand Gestures.

Authors:  Giovanni Ottoboni; Roberto Nicoletti; Alessia Tessari
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-05-18       Impact factor: 3.390

8.  Perceptual Training in Beach Volleyball Defence: Different Effects of Gaze-Path Cueing on Gaze and Decision-Making.

Authors:  André Klostermann; Christian Vater; Ralf Kredel; Ernst-Joachim Hossner
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2015-12-01

9.  When less is more: reduced usefulness training for the learning of anticipation skill in tennis.

Authors:  Nicholas J Smeeton; Raoul Huys; David M Jacobs
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-11-11       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Deceptive body movements reverse spatial cueing in soccer.

Authors:  Michael J Wright; Robin C Jackson
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-08-06       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.