Literature DB >> 19081611

Cost effectiveness of high-risk HPV DNA testing for cervical cancer screening in South Africa.

Arthi Vijayaraghavan1, Molly Efrusy, Gerhard Lindeque, Greta Dreyer, Christopher Santas.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine the cost effectiveness of several cervical cancer screening strategies utilizing HPV testing in South Africa.
METHODS: We developed a lifetime Markov model of the costs, quality of life, and survival associated with screening and treating cervical cancer and its precursors. Screening strategies evaluated included: 1) conventional cytology, 2) cytology followed by HPV testing for triage of equivocal cytology, 3) HPV testing, 4) HPV testing followed by cytology for triage of HPV-positive women, and 5) co-screening with cytology and HPV testing. Primary outcome measures included quality-adjusted life-years saved (QALYs), incremental cost-effectiveness ratios, and lifetime risk of cervical cancer. Costs are in 2006 South African Rand (R).
RESULTS: In a cohort of 100,000 women, starting at age 30 and screening once every 10 years reduced the lifetime risk of cervical cancer by 13-52% depending on the screening strategy used, at an incremental cost of R13,000-R42,000 per QALY. When strategies were compared incrementally, cytology with HPV triage was less expensive and more effective than screening using cytology alone. HPV testing with the use of cytology triage was a more effective strategy and costs an additional R42,121 per QALY. HPV testing with colposcopy for HPV-positive women was the next most effective option at an incremental cost of R1541 per QALY. Simultaneous HPV testing and cytology co-screening was the most effective strategy and had an incremental cost of R25,414 per QALY.
CONCLUSIONS: In our model, HPV testing to screen for cervical cancer and its precursors is a cost-effective strategy in South Africa.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 19081611     DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2008.08.030

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gynecol Oncol        ISSN: 0090-8258            Impact factor:   5.482


  19 in total

1.  Cost-Effectiveness of Primary HPV Testing, Cytology and Co-testing as Cervical Cancer Screening for Women Above Age 30 Years.

Authors:  Xian Wen Jin; Laura Lipold; Julie Foucher; Andrea Sikon; Jennifer Brainard; Jerome Belinson; Sarah Schramm; Kelly Nottingham; Bo Hu; Michael B Rothberg
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2016-07-14       Impact factor: 5.128

Review 2.  HIV, tuberculosis, and noncommunicable diseases: what is known about the costs, effects, and cost-effectiveness of integrated care?

Authors:  Emily P Hyle; Kogieleum Naidoo; Amanda E Su; Wafaa M El-Sadr; Kenneth A Freedberg
Journal:  J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr       Date:  2014-09-01       Impact factor: 3.731

3.  Cost-effectiveness of high-risk human papillomavirus testing for cervical cancer screening in Québec, Canada.

Authors:  Arthi Vijayaraghavan; Molly B Efrusy; Marie-Hélêne Mayrand; Christopher C Santas; Patricia Goggin
Journal:  Can J Public Health       Date:  2010 May-Jun

4.  Cost-effectiveness of using human papillomavirus 16/18 genotype triage in cervical cancer screening.

Authors:  Arthi Vijayaraghavan; Molly B Efrusy; Karyn A Goodman; Christopher C Santas; Warner K Huh
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2010-08-14       Impact factor: 5.482

Review 5.  Is individualized medicine more cost-effective? A systematic review.

Authors:  Maximilian H M Hatz; Katharina Schremser; Wolf H Rogowski
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2014-05       Impact factor: 4.981

6.  Cost-effectiveness analysis of human papillomavirus DNA testing and Pap smear for cervical cancer screening in a publicly financed health-care system.

Authors:  I H-I Chow; C-H Tang; S-L You; C-H Liao; T-Y Chu; C-J Chen; C-A Chen; R-F Pwu
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2010-11-23       Impact factor: 7.640

7.  Economic evaluation of three populational screening strategies for cervical cancer in the county of Valles Occidental: CRICERVA clinical trial.

Authors:  Amelia Acera; Ana Rodriguez; Marta Trapero-Bertran; Pilar Soteras; Norman Sanchez; Josep M Bonet; Josep M Manresa; Pablo Hidalgo; Pere Toran; Gemma Prieto
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2011-10-19       Impact factor: 2.655

8.  High-risk HPV infection after five years in a population-based cohort of Chilean women.

Authors:  Catterina Ferreccio; Vanessa Van De Wyngard; Fabiola Olcay; M Angélica Domínguez; Klaus Puschel; Alejandro H Corvalán; Silvia Franceschi; Peter Jf Snijders
Journal:  Infect Agent Cancer       Date:  2011-11-16       Impact factor: 2.965

9.  Cervical cancer screening with clinic-based Pap test versus home HPV test among Somali immigrant women in Minnesota: a pilot randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Barrett Sewali; Kolawole S Okuyemi; Asli Askhir; Jerome Belinson; Rachel I Vogel; Anne Joseph; Rahel G Ghebre
Journal:  Cancer Med       Date:  2015-02-04       Impact factor: 4.452

10.  HPV-Based Screening, Triage, Treatment, and Followup Strategies in the Management of Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia.

Authors:  Oscar Peralta-Zaragoza; Jessica Deas; Claudia Gómez-Cerón; Wendy Argelia García-Suastegui; Geny Del Socorro Fierros-Zárate; Nadia Judith Jacobo-Herrera
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol Int       Date:  2013-04-14
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.