Literature DB >> 1908147

Intestinal permeability and bacterial translocation following small bowel transplantation in the rat.

D Grant1, D Hurlbut, R Zhong, P Z Wang, H F Chen, B Garcia, R Behme, C Stiller, J Duff.   

Abstract

In addition to its role in absorbing nutrients, the intestinal mucosa provides an important barrier against toxins and bacteria in the bowel lumen. The present study evaluated gut barrier function following orthotopic (in continuity) intestinal grafting in rats. Graft histology, intestinal permeability, and bacterial translocation to the grafted mesenteric lymph nodes, the host's liver, and the host's spleen were assessed on the 3rd, 5th, and 7th postoperative days. The study group received no immunosuppression after allotransplantation. The two control groups included rats with isografts and rats with cyclosporine-treated allografts. On the 7th POD, the study animals had moderate transmural inflammation due to rejection, with normal histology in the isografts and CsA-treated allografts; increased intestinal permeability, measured by urinary excretion of oral 51Cr-EDTA (P less than 0.01); and increased number of bacteria in the MLN and spleen (P less than 0.05). The number of bacteria in the MLN and spleen of the study group positively correlated with the changes in intestinal permeability (P less than 0.05). Rejection of the orthotopic intestinal graft leads to increased intestinal permeability and bacterial translocation from the lumen of the graft to the host's reticuloendothelial system. Measures to improve gut barrier function and antibiotic therapy during rejection episodes may help reduce the incidence of septic complications after intestinal grafting.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1991        PMID: 1908147     DOI: 10.1097/00007890-199108000-00007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Transplantation        ISSN: 0041-1337            Impact factor:   4.939


  8 in total

Review 1.  Recent progress in intestinal transplantation.

Authors:  C I Clark
Journal:  Arch Dis Child       Date:  1992-07       Impact factor: 3.791

2.  Small bowel transplantation.

Authors:  R F Wood; C L Clark
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1992-06-06

Review 3.  Absorptive function following small intestinal transplantation.

Authors:  J Kim; J Fryer; R M Craig
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  1998-09       Impact factor: 3.199

Review 4.  Functional aspects of small bowel transplantation: past, present, and future.

Authors:  M A Meijssen; E Heineman
Journal:  Gut       Date:  1994-10       Impact factor: 23.059

5.  Increased intestinal permeability in rats with graft versus host disease.

Authors:  W A Koltun; M M Bloomer; P Colony; G L Kauffman
Journal:  Gut       Date:  1996-08       Impact factor: 23.059

6.  Cold preservation of the human colon and ileum with University of Wisconsin solution.

Authors:  Y Kawashima; I Takeyoshi; H Furukawa; R G Lee; T E Starzl; S Todo
Journal:  Clin Transplant       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 2.863

7.  Small bowel transplantation. A life-saving option for selected patients with intestinal failure.

Authors:  S Asfar; P Atkison; C Ghent; J Duff; W Wall; S Williams; E Seidman; D Grant
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  1996-05       Impact factor: 3.199

8.  Critical assessment of the methods used for detection of bacterial translocation.

Authors:  F Hernandez Oliveros; Y Zou; G Lopez; M Romero; L Martínez; S González-Reyes; A García; P Peña; J A Tovar
Journal:  Pediatr Surg Int       Date:  2004-02-10       Impact factor: 1.827

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.