Literature DB >> 19081154

Health-related quality of life after permanent I-125 brachytherapy and conformal external beam radiotherapy for prostate cancer--a matched-pair comparison.

Michael Pinkawa1, Branka Asadpour, Marc D Piroth, Bernd Gagel, Sandra Nussen, Mareike Kehl, Holger Borchers, Gerhard Jakse, Michael J Eble.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND
PURPOSE: The aim of the study was to compare quality of life after permanent I-125 brachytherapy (BT) and external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) for prostate cancer.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A group of 104 patients (52 in each group) have been surveyed prospectively before EBRT/BT (time A), at the last day of EBRT (70.2-72.0 Gy) or one month after BT (time B), and a median time of 16 months after EBRT/BT (time C) using a validated questionnaire (Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite). Pairs were matched according to the following criteria: age +/-5 years, prostate volume +/-10 cc, use of antiandrogens, and erectile function.
RESULTS: Urinary function/bother scores decreased significantly more after BT both at time B and time C. Bowel function/bother scores tended to be higher after BT, with a lower percentage of patients with painful bowel movements (BT: 12%/27%/15%; EBRT: 19%/52%/35% at time A/B/C; p<0.05 for differences at times B/C) and rectal bleeding (BT: 12%/12%/12%; EBRT: 8%/14%/17%). No difference concerning erectile dysfunction was found (67% vs. 61% with preserved erections firm enough for intercourse after BT vs. EBRT at time C).
CONCLUSIONS: BT was associated with higher urinary, but lower rectal toxicity. The risk of treatment-associated erectile dysfunction did not differ between these methods.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 19081154     DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2008.11.005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiother Oncol        ISSN: 0167-8140            Impact factor:   6.280


  5 in total

1.  Sexual function and the use of medical devices or drugs to optimize potency after prostate brachytherapy.

Authors:  J Taylor Whaley; Lawrence B Levy; David A Swanson; Thomas J Pugh; Rajat J Kudchadker; Teresa L Bruno; Steven J Frank
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2012-01-31       Impact factor: 7.038

2.  Evidence-based guideline recommendations on low-dose rate brachytherapy in patients with low- or intermediate-risk prostate cancer.

Authors:  George Rodrigues; Xiaomei Yao; D Andrew Loblaw; Michael Brundage; Joseph L Chin
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2013 May-Jun       Impact factor: 1.862

Review 3.  Low-dose rate brachytherapy for patients with low- or intermediate-risk prostate cancer: A systematic review.

Authors:  George Rodrigues; Xiaomei Yao; D Andrew Loblaw; Michael Brundage; Joseph L Chin
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2013-11       Impact factor: 1.862

4.  Impact of post-implant dosimetric parameters on the quality of life of patients treated with low-dose rate brachytherapy for localised prostate cancer: results of a single-institution study.

Authors:  Antonello Veccia; Orazio Caffo; Giovanni Fellin; Salvatore Mussari; Francesco Ziglio; Francesca Maines; Luigi Tomio; Enzo Galligioni
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2015-06-10       Impact factor: 3.481

5.  Failure to address potential bias in non-randomised controlled clinical trials may cause lack of evidence on patient-reported outcomes: a method study.

Authors:  Frank Peinemann; Alexander Michael Labeit; Christian Thielscher; Michael Pinkawa
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2014-06-04       Impact factor: 2.692

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.