Jay E Allard1, G Larry Maxwell. 1. Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Walter Reed Army Medical Center, Washington, DC 20307, USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Uterine cancer is the most common gynecologic malignancy in the United States, with an estimated 40,100 new cases and 7,470 deaths occurring in 2008. Although the incidence of endometrial cancer is lower among black women compared with white women, the proportion of cancer-related deaths among blacks is higher and has continued to rise over the past two decades. METHODS: The authors conducted a survey of recent literature published in the English language and have used these articles as the basis for this review. RESULTS: The etiology for the racial disparity among black women with endometrial cancer is multifactorial and may be the result of barriers that impede access to care, an increased incidence of comorbidities among black women, inequalities in surgical care, adjuvant chemotherapy and radiation treatment, and underlying biological differences associated with more aggressive tumors that often develop in black women. CONCLUSIONS: Black women with endometrial cancer have a poorer prognosis compared with white women. Factors that contribute to this racial disparity include later diagnosis, treatment disparities, comorbid conditions, and genetic differences in tumors. An improved understanding of the causative factors associated with racial disparities in endometrial cancer outcome is needed to facilitate efforts aimed at correcting this important health care problem and providing individualized care to those at highest risk for poor outcome.
BACKGROUND: Uterine cancer is the most common gynecologic malignancy in the United States, with an estimated 40,100 new cases and 7,470 deaths occurring in 2008. Although the incidence of endometrial cancer is lower among black women compared with white women, the proportion of cancer-related deaths among blacks is higher and has continued to rise over the past two decades. METHODS: The authors conducted a survey of recent literature published in the English language and have used these articles as the basis for this review. RESULTS: The etiology for the racial disparity among black women with endometrial cancer is multifactorial and may be the result of barriers that impede access to care, an increased incidence of comorbidities among black women, inequalities in surgical care, adjuvant chemotherapy and radiation treatment, and underlying biological differences associated with more aggressive tumors that often develop in black women. CONCLUSIONS: Black women with endometrial cancer have a poorer prognosis compared with white women. Factors that contribute to this racial disparity include later diagnosis, treatment disparities, comorbid conditions, and genetic differences in tumors. An improved understanding of the causative factors associated with racial disparities in endometrial cancer outcome is needed to facilitate efforts aimed at correcting this important health care problem and providing individualized care to those at highest risk for poor outcome.
Authors: Julie J Ruterbusch; Rouba Ali-Fehmi; Sara H Olson; Shawnita Sealy-Jefferson; Benjamin A Rybicki; Sharon Hensley-Alford; Mohamed A Elshaikh; Arthur R Gaba; Daniel Schultz; Adnan R Munkarah; Michele L Cote Journal: Am J Obstet Gynecol Date: 2014-06-19 Impact factor: 8.661
Authors: Christopher M Tarney; Chunqiao Tian; Guisong Wang; Elizabeth A Dubil; Nicholas W Bateman; John K Chan; Mohamed A Elshaikh; Michele L Cote; Joellen M Schildkraut; Craig D Shriver; Thomas P Conrads; Chad A Hamilton; G Larry Maxwell; Kathleen M Darcy Journal: Gynecol Oncol Date: 2017-08-08 Impact factor: 5.482
Authors: Ashley S Felix; David E Cohn; Theodore M Brasky; Richard Zaino; Kay Park; David G Mutch; William T Creasman; Premal H Thaker; Joan L Walker; Richard G Moore; Shashikant B Lele; Saketh R Guntupalli; Levi S Downs; Christa I Nagel; John F Boggess; Michael L Pearl; Olga B Ioffe; Marcus E Randall; Louise A Brinton Journal: Am J Obstet Gynecol Date: 2018-08-07 Impact factor: 8.661
Authors: Laura Romero-Pérez; Pablo Garcia-Sanz; Alba Mota; Susanna Leskelä; Marta Hergueta-Redondo; Juan Díaz-Martín; M Angeles López-García; M Angeles Castilla; Angel Martínez-Ramírez; Robert A Soslow; Xavier Matias-Guiu; Gema Moreno-Bueno; Jose Palacios Journal: Mod Pathol Date: 2015-09-18 Impact factor: 7.842
Authors: Eric R Gamazon; Navin Pinto; Anuar Konkashbaev; Hae Kyung Im; Sharon J Diskin; Wendy B London; John M Maris; M Eileen Dolan; Nancy J Cox; Susan L Cohn Journal: J Natl Cancer Inst Date: 2012-12-14 Impact factor: 13.506
Authors: Cheng-Chia Wu; Tony J C Wang; Ashish Jani; Juan P Estrada; Timothy Ung; Daniel S Chow; Jennifer E Soun; Shumaila Saad; Yasir H Qureshi; Robyn Gartrell; Heva J Saadatmand; Anurag Saraf; Matthew D Garrett; Christopher S Grubb; Steven R Isaacson; Simon K Cheng; Michael B Sisti; Jeffrey N Bruce; Sameer A Sheth; Andrew B Lassman; Guy M McKhann Journal: World Neurosurg Date: 2015-12-31 Impact factor: 2.104