Literature DB >> 1907669

A regional prospective study of in-hospital mortality associated with coronary artery bypass grafting. The Northern New England Cardiovascular Disease Study Group.

G T O'Connor1, S K Plume, E M Olmstead, L H Coffin, J R Morton, C T Maloney, E R Nowicki, J F Tryzelaar, F Hernandez, L Adrian.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: A prospective regional study was conducted to determine if the observed differences in in-hospital mortality rates associated with coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) are solely the result of differences in patient case mix. DESIGN-Regional prospective cohort study. Data including patient demographic and historical data, body surface area, cardiac catheterization results, priority of surgery, comorbidity, and status at hospital discharge were collected. This study presents data for 3055 CABG patients between July 1, 1987, and April 15, 1989.
SETTING: This study includes data from all surgeons performing cardiothoracic surgery in Maine, New Hampshire, and Vermont; the data were collected from five regional medical centers. PATIENTS: Data were collected from all consecutive isolated CABG surgery patients during the study period. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Crude and adjusted in-hospital mortality rates associated with CABG. MAIN
RESULTS: The overall crude in-hospital mortality rate for isolated CABG was 4.3%. The rate varied among centers (range, 3.1% to 6.3%) and among surgeons (range, 1.9% to 9.2%). Predictors of in-hospital mortality included increased age, female gender, small body surface area, greater comorbidity, reoperation, poorer cardiac function as indicated by a lower ejection fraction, increased left ventricular end diastolic pressure and emergent or urgent surgery. After adjusting for the effects of potentially confounding variables, substantial and statistically significant variability was observed among medical centers (P = .021) and among surgeons (P = .025).
CONCLUSION: We conclude that the observed differences in in-hospital mortality rates among institutions and among surgeons in northern New England are not solely the result of differences in case mix as described by these variables and may reflect differences in currently unknown aspects of patient care. Understanding this variation requires a detailed understanding of the processes of care.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1991        PMID: 1907669

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JAMA        ISSN: 0098-7484            Impact factor:   56.272


  43 in total

1.  Risk adjustment using administrative data: impact of a diagnosis-type indicator.

Authors:  W A Ghali; H Quan; R Brant
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 5.128

2.  HIV-seropositive surgeons: informed consent and public health policy.

Authors:  J G Wright; P A Singer
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1992-07-01       Impact factor: 8.262

3.  The Leapfrog volume criteria may fall short in identifying high-quality surgical centers.

Authors:  Caprice K Christian; Michael L Gustafson; Rebecca A Betensky; Jennifer Daley; Michael J Zinner
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 12.969

4.  Application of the Parsonnet scoring system for a Canadian cardiac surgery program.

Authors:  Benoit de Varennes; Kevin Lachapelle; Renzo Cecere; Patrick Ergina; Dominique Shum-Tim; Christo Tchervenkov; John Sampalis
Journal:  Can J Cardiol       Date:  2007-11       Impact factor: 5.223

5.  Surgery: can checklists improve surgical outcomes?

Authors:  John D Birkmeyer; David C Miller
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 14.432

6.  Coronary artery bypass grafting in Canada: national and provincial mortality trends, 1992-1995.

Authors:  W A Ghali; H Quan; R Brant
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1998-07-14       Impact factor: 8.262

7.  Variation in arterial inflow temperature: a regional quality improvement project.

Authors:  Craig S Warren; Gordon R DeFoe; Robert C Groom; John W Pieroni; Candace S Groski; Catherine B Morse; Ellen M Connors; Peter J Lataille; Cathy S Ross; Donald S Likosky
Journal:  J Extra Corpor Technol       Date:  2011-06

8.  A predictive index for length of stay in the intensive care unit following cardiac surgery.

Authors:  J V Tu; C D Mazer; C Levinton; P W Armstrong; C D Naylor
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1994-07-15       Impact factor: 8.262

9.  Cardiopulmonary bypass recommendations in adults: the northern New England experience.

Authors:  Christian P DioDato; Donald S Likosky; Gordon R DeFoe; Robert C Groom; Kenneth G Shann; Charles F Krumholz; Craig S Warren; John W Pieroni; Arnold Benak; Kevin McCusker; Elaine M Olmstead; Cathy S Ross; Gerald T O'Connor
Journal:  J Extra Corpor Technol       Date:  2008-03

10.  Detecting the blind spot: complications in the trauma registry and trauma quality improvement.

Authors:  Mark R Hemmila; Jill L Jakubus; Wendy L Wahl; Saman Arbabi; William G Henderson; Shukri F Khuri; Paul A Taheri; Darrell A Campbell
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 3.982

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.