Literature DB >> 19076567

What a reviewer wants.

Andrew J Davidson1, John B Carlin.   

Abstract

Understanding what a reviewer wants helps authors write better papers and design better research studies. Central to any research study is the research question. This is the first thing the reviewer looks for. The question, or research aim, should be relevant, original and very clearly defined. The paper should also be scientifically valid; the methods should achieve the aim by addressing the question, and the conclusions should match the results. The statistical analysis often attracts criticism, especially the relatively simple problems arising with the use of P-values and the concepts of statistical and clinical significance. There are several agreed guidelines describing exactly how studies should be reported. Following these is a great help to reviewers.

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 19076567     DOI: 10.1111/j.1460-9592.2008.02813.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Paediatr Anaesth        ISSN: 1155-5645            Impact factor:   2.556


  1 in total

1.  Writing education studies for publication.

Authors:  Gail M Sullivan
Journal:  J Grad Med Educ       Date:  2012-06
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.