Literature DB >> 19076177

Immediate/Early loading of zygomatic implants: clinical experiences after 2 to 5 years of follow-up.

Carlos Aparicio1, Wafaa Ouazzani, Arnau Aparicio, Vanessa Fortes, Rosa Muela, Andres Pascual, Maria Codesal, Natalia Barluenga, Monica Franch.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Conventional prosthetic treatment of the edentulous and resorbed maxilla with zygomatic implants is a lengthy procedure. Today, immediate/early loading is a clinical reality and it is possible that such protocols could be used also for zygomatic implants.
PURPOSE: The aim of the present study is to report on the clinical outcomes of immediate/early loading of zygomatic implants for prosthetic rehabilitation of edentulous and severely resorbed maxillary cases.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 47 zygomatic and 129 regular implants were placed in 25 consecutive patients with total (N = 23) or partial (N = 2) edentulism in the maxilla. The patients had less than 4 mm of available bone height and width distal to the canine pillars. Straight and angulated abutments and impression copings were attached to the implants during surgery. Impressions and bite registrations were made and 19 patients received a bridge within 24 hours and six patients were rehabilitated within 5 days. Screw-retained full arch restorations were used in 23 patients and cemented in 2 patients. The patients were instructed for a soft diet during 4 months. Follow-up controls were performed at 1, 4, and 12 months and thereafter annually. All patients were followed for at least 2 years and up to 5 years in function.
RESULTS: All zygomatic implants were stable during the follow-up (cumulative survival rate 100%). One regular implant placed in the pterygoid plate failed after 52 months of loading (cumulative survival rate 99.2%). Apart from fracture of one abutment screw and of anterior teeth in five patients, no other complications were noted.
CONCLUSIONS: Within the limitations of the present study, it is concluded that immediate/early loading is a viable treatment modality for prosthetic rehabilitation of the severely resorbed maxilla using zygomatic and conventional implants.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 19076177     DOI: 10.1111/j.1708-8208.2008.00134.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Implant Dent Relat Res        ISSN: 1523-0899            Impact factor:   3.932


  13 in total

Review 1.  Zygomatic implants: a critical review of the surgical techniques.

Authors:  Bruno Ramos Chrcanovic; Alexsander Ribeiro Pedrosa; Antônio Luís Neto Custódio
Journal:  Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2012-01-25

Review 2.  Survival and complications of zygomatic implants: a systematic review.

Authors:  Bruno Ramos Chrcanovic; Mauro Henrique Nogueira Guimarães Abreu
Journal:  Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2012-05-06

3.  Surgical and prosthetic rehabilitation of siblings with Witkop tooth and nail syndrome using zygomatic implants: a familial case series of 3 patients with up to 15-year follow-up.

Authors:  Kale B McMillan; Dane C McMillan; Kevin Arce; Thomas J Salinas
Journal:  Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2022-07-30

4.  Survival of conventional dental implants in the edentulous atrophic maxilla in combination with zygomatic implants: a 20-year retrospective study.

Authors:  Luc Vrielinck; Jorden Blok; Constantinus Politis
Journal:  Int J Implant Dent       Date:  2022-06-15

5.  Simplifying the Treatment of Bone Atrophy in the Posterior Regions: Combination of Zygomatic and Wide-Short Implants-A Case Report with 2 Years of Follow-Up.

Authors:  Fernanda Faot; Geninho Thomé; Amália Machado Bielemann; Caio Hermann; Ana Cláudia Moreira Melo; Luis Eduardo Marques Padovan; Ivete Aparecida de Mattias Sartori
Journal:  Case Rep Dent       Date:  2016-10-27

Review 6.  Full arch rehabilitation in patients with atrophic upper jaws with zygomatic implants: a systematic review.

Authors:  Ana Helena Pereira Gracher; Marcos Boaventura de Moura; Patrícia da Silva Peres; Geninho Thomé; Luís Eduardo Marques Padovan; Larissa Carvalho Trojan
Journal:  Int J Implant Dent       Date:  2021-02-26

7.  Accuracy of digital planning in zygomatic implants.

Authors:  B Xing Gao; O Iglesias-Velázquez; F G F Tresguerres; A Rodríguez González Cortes; I F Tresguerres; R Ortega Aranegui; R M López-Pintor; J López-Quiles; J Torres
Journal:  Int J Implant Dent       Date:  2021-07-22

8.  Histological Features and Biocompatibility of Bone and Soft Tissue Substitutes in the Atrophic Alveolar Ridge Reconstruction.

Authors:  Carlo Maiorana; Mario Beretta; Davide Rancitelli; Giovanni Battista Grossi; Marco Cicciù; Alan Scott Herford
Journal:  Case Rep Dent       Date:  2016-02-23

9.  Surgical complications in zygomatic implants: A systematic review.

Authors:  P Molinero-Mourelle; L Baca-Gonzalez; B Gao; L-M Saez-Alcaide; A Helm; J Lopez-Quiles
Journal:  Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal       Date:  2016-11-01

10.  Bone Regeneration and Soft Tissue Enhancement Around Zygomatic Implants: Retrospective Case Series.

Authors:  Peñarrocha-Diago M; Bernabeu-Mira Jc; Fernández-Ruíz A; Aparicio C; Peñarrocha-Oltra D
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2020-03-29       Impact factor: 3.623

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.