Literature DB >> 19076143

Lymphovascular invasion predicts poor outcome of urothelial carcinoma of renal pelvis after nephroureterectomy.

Shiu-Dong Chung1, Shuo-Meng Wang, Ming-Kuen Lai, Chao-Yuan Huang, Chun-Hou Liao, Kuo-How Huang, Yeong-Shiau Pu, Shih-Chieh Chueh, Hong-Jeng Yu.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the significance of lymphovascular invasion (LVI) to predict cancer-specific survival (CSS) in patients with renal pelvic urothelial carcinoma (UC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: In all, 76 patients with primary renal pelvic UC were treated by nephroureterectomy (NU). Inclusion criteria included nonmetastatic renal pelvic UC with no previous history of bladder cancer, concomitant ureteric lesion, or neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Age, gender, adrenalectomized or not, pathological T stage, grade, and LVI were examined by univariate and multivariate analyses to determine which were independent risk factors.
RESULTS: In all, 38 men and 38 women were included with a mean (range) age of 66 (41-93) years. The median (range) follow-up was 48 (15-88) months. At follow-up, eight cancer-related deaths (10.5%) were censored, and 66 patients (85.9%) were alive and disease-free. LVI was the only significant predictor of CSS in the univariate and multivariate analyses.
CONCLUSIONS: Adrenal metastases from primary renal pelvic UCs were rare. The present results suggest that ipsilateral adrenalectomy is not necessary during radical NU for treating patients with renal pelvic UCs. LVI appears to be a better prognostic factor for predicting poor outcome of renal pelvic UC than pT stage or tumour grade when using the current tumour-nodes-metastases staging system.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 19076143     DOI: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2008.08253.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BJU Int        ISSN: 1464-4096            Impact factor:   5.588


  5 in total

1.  [Urothelial carcinoma of the upper urinary tract: clinical and pathological criteria and their predictive implications after radical nephroureterectomy].

Authors:  Christian Seitz; Paul Schramek
Journal:  Wien Med Wochenschr       Date:  2011-08

2.  Upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma: what have we learned in the last 4 years?

Authors:  Mesut Remzi; Shahrokh Shariat; Wilhelm Huebner; Harun Fajkovic; Christian Seitz
Journal:  Ther Adv Urol       Date:  2011-04

Review 3.  Prognostic factors for upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma.

Authors:  Thomas F Chromecki; Karim Bensalah; Mesut Remzi; Grégory Verhoest; Eugene K Cha; Douglas S Scherr; Giacomo Novara; Pierre I Karakiewicz; Shahrokh F Shariat
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2011-07-05       Impact factor: 14.432

4.  Prognostic significance of urothelial carcinoma with divergent differentiation in upper urinary tract after radical nephroureterectomy without metastatic diseases: A retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  Chuan Qin; En-Li Liang; Zhi-Yong Du; Xiao-Yu Qiu; Gang Tang; Fei-Ran Chen; Bo Zhang; Da-Wei Tian; Hai-Long Hu; Chang-Li Wu
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2017-05       Impact factor: 1.889

Review 5.  Association between demographic factors and prognosis in urothelial carcinoma of the upper urinary tract: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Hyung Suk Kim; Chang Wook Jeong; Cheol Kwak; Hyeon Hoe Kim; Ja Hyeon Ku
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2017-01-31
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.