OBJECTIVE: Although amygdala dysfunction is reported in schizophrenia, it is unknown whether this deficit represents a heritable phenotype that is related to risk for schizophrenia or whether it is related to disease state. The purpose of the present study was to examine amygdala response to threatening faces among healthy siblings of schizophrenia patients in whom a subtler heritable deficit might be observed. METHOD: Participants were 34 schizophrenia patients, 29 unaffected siblings, and 20 healthy comparison subjects. Blood-oxygen-level-dependent (BOLD) functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) was conducted during an implicit facial information processing task. The N-back working memory task, which has been shown to elicit prefrontal cortex abnormalities in unaffected siblings of schizophrenia patients, was employed as a positive experimental control. RESULTS: Schizophrenia patients demonstrated a deficit in amygdala reactivity to negative face stimuli and an alteration, correlated with neuroleptic drug dosage, in the functional coupling between the amygdala and subgenual cingulate. In contrast, unaffected siblings showed a pattern that was not statistically different from that of healthy comparison subjects. During the N-back working memory task, both schizophrenia patients and their unaffected siblings demonstrated a pattern of inefficient prefrontal cortex engagement, which is consistent with earlier evidence that this pattern is related to genetic risk for schizophrenia. CONCLUSIONS: These data suggest that the pathophysiological mechanism underlying the inability of individuals with schizophrenia to normally engage the amygdala in processing fearful and angry facial representations is more likely a phenomenon related to the disease state, specifically to treatment.
OBJECTIVE: Although amygdala dysfunction is reported in schizophrenia, it is unknown whether this deficit represents a heritable phenotype that is related to risk for schizophrenia or whether it is related to disease state. The purpose of the present study was to examine amygdala response to threatening faces among healthy siblings of schizophreniapatients in whom a subtler heritable deficit might be observed. METHOD:Participants were 34 schizophreniapatients, 29 unaffected siblings, and 20 healthy comparison subjects. Blood-oxygen-level-dependent (BOLD) functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) was conducted during an implicit facial information processing task. The N-back working memory task, which has been shown to elicit prefrontal cortex abnormalities in unaffected siblings of schizophreniapatients, was employed as a positive experimental control. RESULTS:Schizophreniapatients demonstrated a deficit in amygdala reactivity to negative face stimuli and an alteration, correlated with neuroleptic drug dosage, in the functional coupling between the amygdala and subgenual cingulate. In contrast, unaffected siblings showed a pattern that was not statistically different from that of healthy comparison subjects. During the N-back working memory task, both schizophreniapatients and their unaffected siblings demonstrated a pattern of inefficient prefrontal cortex engagement, which is consistent with earlier evidence that this pattern is related to genetic risk for schizophrenia. CONCLUSIONS: These data suggest that the pathophysiological mechanism underlying the inability of individuals with schizophrenia to normally engage the amygdala in processing fearful and angry facial representations is more likely a phenomenon related to the disease state, specifically to treatment.
Authors: Ute Habel; Martina Klein; N Jon Shah; Ivan Toni; Karl Zilles; Peter Falkai; Frank Schneider Journal: Am J Psychiatry Date: 2004-10 Impact factor: 18.112
Authors: Andreas Heinz; Dieter F Braus; Michael N Smolka; Jana Wrase; Imke Puls; Derik Hermann; Sabine Klein; Sabine M Grüsser; Herta Flor; Gunter Schumann; Karl Mann; Christian Büchel Journal: Nat Neurosci Date: 2004-12-12 Impact factor: 24.884
Authors: T E Goldberg; E F Torrey; J M Gold; L B Bigelow; R D Ragland; E Taylor; D R Weinberger Journal: Schizophr Res Date: 1995-09 Impact factor: 4.939
Authors: Michael N Smolka; Gunter Schumann; Jana Wrase; Sabine M Grüsser; Herta Flor; Karl Mann; Dieter F Braus; David Goldman; Christian Büchel; Andreas Heinz Journal: J Neurosci Date: 2005-01-26 Impact factor: 6.167
Authors: Karolina Kauppi; Lars T Westlye; Martin Tesli; Francesco Bettella; Christine L Brandt; Morten Mattingsdal; Torill Ueland; Thomas Espeseth; Ingrid Agartz; Ingrid Melle; Srdjan Djurovic; Ole A Andreassen Journal: Schizophr Bull Date: 2014-11-11 Impact factor: 9.306
Authors: Alan Anticevic; Jared X Van Snellenberg; Rachel E Cohen; Grega Repovs; Erin C Dowd; Deanna M Barch Journal: Schizophr Bull Date: 2010-12-01 Impact factor: 9.306
Authors: Daniel H Wolf; Theodore D Satterthwaite; James Loughead; Amy Pinkham; Eve Overton; Mark A Elliott; Gersham W Dent; Mark A Smith; Ruben C Gur; Raquel E Gur Journal: Psychopharmacology (Berl) Date: 2011-05-21 Impact factor: 4.530
Authors: Kristin L Bigos; Venkata S Mattay; Joseph H Callicott; Richard E Straub; Radhakrishna Vakkalanka; Bhaskar Kolachana; Thomas M Hyde; Barbara K Lipska; Joel E Kleinman; Daniel R Weinberger Journal: Arch Gen Psychiatry Date: 2010-09
Authors: Eugenia Radulescu; Fabio Sambataro; Venkata S Mattay; Joseph H Callicott; Richard E Straub; Mitsuyuki Matsumoto; Daniel R Weinberger; Stefano Marenco Journal: Neuropsychopharmacology Date: 2012-09-12 Impact factor: 7.853