| Literature DB >> 1907447 |
N W Pearlman1, G V Stiegmann, V Vance, L W Norton, R C Bell, R Staerkel, C W Van Way, E J Bartle.
Abstract
Carbon dioxide laser incisions are reported to be less painful, less bloody, and less prone to seroma formation and to heal better than scalpel or electrosurgical incisions. We compared all three modalities in a prospective randomized study of cholecystectomy incisions. Time required for the incision and incisional blood loss was less with electrosurgery than with the carbon dioxide laser or scalpel. Postoperative pain and wound healing, however, were the same for all three techniques. The carbon dioxide laser appears to offer no advantage over conventional means of making a standard incision.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 1991 PMID: 1907447 DOI: 10.1001/archsurg.1991.01410320108015
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Arch Surg ISSN: 0004-0010