OBJECTIVE: (a) To compare the efficacy of low-activity (2 GBq; 54 mCi) (131)I ablation using l-thyroxine withdrawal or rhTSH stimulation, and (b) to assess the influence of thyroid remnants volume on the ablation rate. DESIGN: Patients underwent neck ultrasound, (131)I neck scintigraphy and radioiodine uptake. Post-therapy whole body scan (WBS) was acquired after 4-6 days. Ablation was assessed after 6-12 months by WBS, Tg and TgAb following l-thyroxine withdrawal. METHODS: Group A: preparation by L-T(4) withdrawal (37 days); 21 patients received (131)I (2.02+/-0.22 GBq; 54.6+/-5.9 mCi) and on the day of treatment, TSH, Tg, TgAb were measured; Group B: stimulation by rhTSH; 21 patients received (131)I (1.97+/-0.18 GBq; 53.2+/-4.9 mCi) 24 h after the second injection of rhTSH (0.9 mg) and TSH, Tg and TgAb were measured after 2 days. RESULTS: At follow-up, 90.0% of patients from group A and 85.0% of patients from group B had Tg levels <1 ng/ml; no uptake was observed in 95.2% and in 90.5% of patients from group A or B respectively, with no statistical differences for both ablation criteria. Before (131)I treatment, small thyroid remnants (<1 ml) were detected by US in <25% of all patients. CONCLUSIONS: The use of rhTSH for the preparation of low-risk patients to ablation therapy with low activities of (131)I (2 GBq; 54 mCi) is safe and effective and avoids hypothyroidism. The presence of thyroid remnants smaller than 1 ml at US evaluation had no effect on the ablation rate.
RCT Entities:
OBJECTIVE: (a) To compare the efficacy of low-activity (2 GBq; 54 mCi) (131)I ablation using l-thyroxine withdrawal or rhTSH stimulation, and (b) to assess the influence of thyroid remnants volume on the ablation rate. DESIGN:Patients underwent neck ultrasound, (131)I neck scintigraphy and radioiodine uptake. Post-therapy whole body scan (WBS) was acquired after 4-6 days. Ablation was assessed after 6-12 months by WBS, Tg and TgAb following l-thyroxine withdrawal. METHODS: Group A: preparation by L-T(4) withdrawal (37 days); 21 patients received (131)I (2.02+/-0.22 GBq; 54.6+/-5.9 mCi) and on the day of treatment, TSH, Tg, TgAb were measured; Group B: stimulation by rhTSH; 21 patients received (131)I (1.97+/-0.18 GBq; 53.2+/-4.9 mCi) 24 h after the second injection of rhTSH (0.9 mg) and TSH, Tg and TgAb were measured after 2 days. RESULTS: At follow-up, 90.0% of patients from group A and 85.0% of patients from group B had Tg levels <1 ng/ml; no uptake was observed in 95.2% and in 90.5% of patients from group A or B respectively, with no statistical differences for both ablation criteria. Before (131)I treatment, small thyroid remnants (<1 ml) were detected by US in <25% of all patients. CONCLUSIONS: The use of rhTSH for the preparation of low-risk patients to ablation therapy with low activities of (131)I (2 GBq; 54 mCi) is safe and effective and avoids hypothyroidism. The presence of thyroid remnants smaller than 1 ml at US evaluation had no effect on the ablation rate.
Authors: Daniele Barbaro; Frederik A Verburg; Markus Luster; Christoph Reiners; Domenico Rubello Journal: Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging Date: 2010-03-20 Impact factor: 9.236
Authors: Bryan R Haugen; Erik K Alexander; Keith C Bible; Gerard M Doherty; Susan J Mandel; Yuri E Nikiforov; Furio Pacini; Gregory W Randolph; Anna M Sawka; Martin Schlumberger; Kathryn G Schuff; Steven I Sherman; Julie Ann Sosa; David L Steward; R Michael Tuttle; Leonard Wartofsky Journal: Thyroid Date: 2016-01 Impact factor: 6.568
Authors: Frederik A Verburg; Michael Lassmann; Uwe Mäder; Markus Luster; Christoph Reiners; Heribert Hänscheid Journal: Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging Date: 2011-01-06 Impact factor: 9.236
Authors: Yu-Yu Liu; Michael P Brandt; Daniel H Shen; Richard T Kloos; Xiaoli Zhang; Sissy M Jhiang Journal: Endocr Relat Cancer Date: 2010-11-30 Impact factor: 5.678