Literature DB >> 19074057

MDS: a stem cell disorder--but what exactly is wrong with the primitive hematopoietic cells in this disease?

Stephen D Nimer1.   

Abstract

Despite the various abnormalities identified in the immune system or the bone marrow microenvironment in patients with myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS), most of the investigation of this disorder has centered on the hematopoietic stem/progenitor compartment. It is generally written that MDS is a stem cell disorder, and there is certainly evidence supporting this view. However, whether it occurs in a cell with only myeloid multipotentiality (i.e., that involves megakaryocytic, erythroid and granulocytic/monocytic lineages) or occurs in a true stem cell is open to debate. The absence of an assay for human stem cells necessitates the use of surrogate markers for such cells, such as gene expression profiles, or the identification of specific genetic or epigenetic abnormalities that are found in multiple lineages. Clearly, the common cytogenetic and genetic abnormalities found in MDS are most indicative of a clonal myeloid disease similar to AML, rather than a lymphoid disease, and the often tri-lineage ineffective hematopoiesis and dysplasia are generally not found within the lymphoid compartment. Recent studies, using modern molecular detection techniques, have identified new recurring molecular lesions in these disorders but have not really unraveled its pathogenesis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 19074057     DOI: 10.1182/asheducation-2008.1.43

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hematology Am Soc Hematol Educ Program        ISSN: 1520-4383


  19 in total

Review 1.  Mesenchymal stem cells in pathogenesis of myelodysplastic syndromes.

Authors:  Jingya Wang; Zhijian Xiao
Journal:  Stem Cell Investig       Date:  2014-08-21

Review 2.  Myelodysplastic syndromes: revisiting the role of the bone marrow microenvironment in disease pathogenesis.

Authors:  Marc H G P Raaijmakers
Journal:  Int J Hematol       Date:  2012-01-06       Impact factor: 2.490

3.  Stress-induced hematopoietic failure in the absence of immediate early response gene X-1 (IEX-1, IER3).

Authors:  Haley Ramsey; Qi Zhang; Diane E Brown; David P Steensma; Charles P Lin; Mei X Wu
Journal:  Haematologica       Date:  2013-09-20       Impact factor: 9.941

Review 4.  Unraveling the molecular pathophysiology of myelodysplastic syndromes.

Authors:  Rafael Bejar; Ross Levine; Benjamin L Ebert
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2011-01-10       Impact factor: 44.544

Review 5.  Revisiting the case for genetically engineered mouse models in human myelodysplastic syndrome research.

Authors:  Ting Zhou; Marsha C Kinney; Linda M Scott; Sandra S Zinkel; Vivienne I Rebel
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2015-06-15       Impact factor: 22.113

6.  Sept4/ARTS is required for stem cell apoptosis and tumor suppression.

Authors:  María García-Fernández; Holger Kissel; Samara Brown; Travis Gorenc; Andrew J Schile; Shahin Rafii; Sarit Larisch; Hermann Steller
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  2010-10-15       Impact factor: 11.361

7.  Down-regulation of TET2 in CD3⁺ and CD34⁺ cells of myelodysplastic syndromes and enhances CD34⁺ cells proliferation.

Authors:  Wei Zhang; Zonghong Shao; Rong Fu; Huaquan Wang; Lijuan Li; Hui Liu
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Pathol       Date:  2015-09-01

8.  Azacitidine in the management of patients with myelodysplastic syndromes.

Authors:  Cyrus Khan; Neeta Pathe; Salman Fazal; John Lister; James M Rossetti
Journal:  Ther Adv Hematol       Date:  2012-12

9.  Intravascular lymphomatosis of the brain in a patient with myelodysplastic syndrome.

Authors:  Gregorius J Sips; Colum F Amory; Bradley N Delman; George M Kleinman; Lewis R Lipsey; Stanley Tuhrim
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurol       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 42.937

10.  Loss of RhoB expression enhances the myelodysplastic phenotype of mammalian diaphanous-related Formin mDia1 knockout mice.

Authors:  Aaron D DeWard; Kellie Leali; Richard A West; George C Prendergast; Arthur S Alberts
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2009-09-21       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.