Literature DB >> 19073992

Management of work-relevant upper limb disorders: a review.

A Kim Burton1, Nicholas A S Kendall, Brian G Pearce, Lisa N Birrell, L Christopher Bainbridge.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Upper limb disorders (ULDs) are clinically challenging and responsible for considerable work loss. There is a need to determine effective approaches for their management. AIM: To determine evidence-based management strategies for work-relevant ULDs and explore whether a biopsychosocial approach is appropriate.
METHODS: Literature review using a best evidence synthesis. Data from articles identified through systematic searching of electronic databases and citation tracking were extracted into evidence tables. The information was synthesized into high-level evidence statements, which were ordered into themes covering classification/diagnosis, epidemiology, associations/risks and management/treatment, focusing on return to work or work retention and taking account of distinctions between non-specific complaints and specific diagnoses.
RESULTS: Neither biomedical treatment nor ergonomic workplace interventions alone offer an optimal solution; rather, multimodal interventions show considerable promise, particularly for occupational outcomes. Early return to work, or work retention, is an important goal for most cases and may be facilitated, where necessary, by transitional work arrangements. The emergent evidence indicates that successful management strategies require all the players to be on side and acting in a coordinated fashion; this requires engaging employers and workers to participate.
CONCLUSIONS: The biopsychosocial model applies: biological considerations should not be ignored, but psychosocial factors are more influential for occupational outcomes. Implementation of interventions that address the full range of psychosocial issues will require a cultural shift in the way the relationship between upper limb complaints and work is conceived and handled. Dissemination of evidence-based messages can contribute to the needed cultural shift.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 19073992     DOI: 10.1093/occmed/kqn151

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Occup Med (Lond)        ISSN: 0962-7480            Impact factor:   1.611


  5 in total

1.  Are work return and leaves of absence after acetabular fractures predictable? : A retrospective study of 108 patients.

Authors:  A Aprato; A Joeris; F Tosto; V Kalampoki; E Rometsch; M Favuto; A Stucchi; M Azi; A Massè
Journal:  Musculoskelet Surg       Date:  2016-10-12

2.  Bearing the brunt: co-workers' experiences of work reintegration processes.

Authors:  Debra A Dunstan; Ellen MacEachen
Journal:  J Occup Rehabil       Date:  2013-03

3.  Prevalence of and prevention for work-related upper limb disorders among physical therapists: a systematic review.

Authors:  Eliza Waller; Andrea Bowens; Nicholas Washmuth
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2022-05-14       Impact factor: 2.562

4.  Validity and Reliability of the Upper Extremity Work Demands Scale.

Authors:  Nora W Jacobs; Redmar J Berduszek; Pieter U Dijkstra; Corry K van der Sluis
Journal:  J Occup Rehabil       Date:  2017-12

Review 5.  Efficacy of exercise therapy in workers with rotator cuff tendinopathy: a systematic review.

Authors:  François Desmeules; Jennifer Boudreault; Clermont E Dionne; Pierre Frémont; Véronique Lowry; Joy C MacDermid; Jean-Sébastien Roy
Journal:  J Occup Health       Date:  2016-08-04       Impact factor: 2.708

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.