PURPOSE: Insulin-like growth factor (IGF)-I and IGF-II stimulate neoplastic cell growth and inhibit apoptosis, whereas IGF-binding protein-3 (IGFBP-3) inhibits the bioavailability of IGF-I and has independent proapoptotic activity. We examined the influence of baseline plasma levels of IGF-I, IGF-II, IGFBP-3, and C-peptide on outcome among patients receiving first-line chemotherapy for metastatic colorectal cancer. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: The plasma levels of IGF-I, IGF-II, IGFBP-3, and C-peptide as well as data on prognostic factors and body size were measured at baseline among 527 patients participating in a randomized trial of first-line chemotherapy for metastatic colorectal cancer. RESULTS:Higher baseline plasma IGFBP-3 levels were associated with a significantly greater chemotherapy response rate (P = 0.03) after adjusting for other prognostic factors, whereas neither IGF-I nor IGF-II levels significantly predicted tumor response. Higher levels of IGF-I, IGF-II, and IGFBP-3 were all univariately associated with improved overall survival (P = 0.0001 for all). In a model that mutually adjusted for IGF-I and IGFBP-3, as well as other prognostic factors, increasing baseline-circulating IGFBP-3 was associated with a significantly longer time to tumor progression (P = 0.03), whereas circulating IGF-I was not associated with disease progression (P = 0.95). Levels of C-peptide were not associated with any measure of patient outcome. CONCLUSION: Among colorectal cancer patients receivingfirst-line chemotherapy, increasing levels of IGFBP-3, an endogenous antagonist to IGF-I, are associated with an improved objective treatment response and a prolonged time to cancer progression. The IGF pathway may represent an important target for future treatment strategies.
RCT Entities:
PURPOSE:Insulin-like growth factor (IGF)-I and IGF-II stimulate neoplastic cell growth and inhibit apoptosis, whereas IGF-binding protein-3 (IGFBP-3) inhibits the bioavailability of IGF-I and has independent proapoptotic activity. We examined the influence of baseline plasma levels of IGF-I, IGF-II, IGFBP-3, and C-peptide on outcome among patients receiving first-line chemotherapy for metastatic colorectal cancer. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: The plasma levels of IGF-I, IGF-II, IGFBP-3, and C-peptide as well as data on prognostic factors and body size were measured at baseline among 527 patients participating in a randomized trial of first-line chemotherapy for metastatic colorectal cancer. RESULTS: Higher baseline plasma IGFBP-3 levels were associated with a significantly greater chemotherapy response rate (P = 0.03) after adjusting for other prognostic factors, whereas neither IGF-I nor IGF-II levels significantly predicted tumor response. Higher levels of IGF-I, IGF-II, and IGFBP-3 were all univariately associated with improved overall survival (P = 0.0001 for all). In a model that mutually adjusted for IGF-I and IGFBP-3, as well as other prognostic factors, increasing baseline-circulating IGFBP-3 was associated with a significantly longer time to tumor progression (P = 0.03), whereas circulating IGF-I was not associated with disease progression (P = 0.95). Levels of C-peptide were not associated with any measure of patient outcome. CONCLUSION: Among colorectal cancerpatients receiving first-line chemotherapy, increasing levels of IGFBP-3, an endogenous antagonist to IGF-I, are associated with an improved objective treatment response and a prolonged time to cancer progression. The IGF pathway may represent an important target for future treatment strategies.
Authors: E Giovannucci; M N Pollak; E A Platz; W C Willett; M J Stampfer; N Majeed; G A Colditz; F E Speizer; S E Hankinson Journal: Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev Date: 2000-04 Impact factor: 4.254
Authors: R Kaaks; P Toniolo; A Akhmedkhanov; A Lukanova; C Biessy; H Dechaud; S Rinaldi; A Zeleniuch-Jacquotte; R E Shore; E Riboli Journal: J Natl Cancer Inst Date: 2000-10-04 Impact factor: 13.506
Authors: Kelly J Hunt; Paolo Toniolo; Arslan Akhmedkhanov; Annekatrin Lukanova; Henri Dechaud; Sabina Rinaldi; Anne Zeleniuch-Jacquotte; Roy E Shore; Elio Riboli; Rudolf Kaaks Journal: Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev Date: 2002-09 Impact factor: 4.254
Authors: Kimmie Ng; Daniel J Sargent; Richard M Goldberg; Jeffrey A Meyerhardt; Erin M Green; Henry C Pitot; Bruce W Hollis; Michael N Pollak; Charles S Fuchs Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2011-03-21 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: E M V de Cuba; R Kwakman; M van Egmond; L J W Bosch; H J Bonjer; G A Meijer; E A te Velde Journal: Virchows Arch Date: 2012-07-24 Impact factor: 4.064
Authors: Josephina G Kuiper; Amanda I Phipps; Marian L Neuhouser; Rowan T Chlebowski; Cynthia A Thomson; Melinda L Irwin; Dorothy S Lane; Jean Wactawski-Wende; Lifang Hou; Rebecca D Jackson; Ellen Kampman; Polly A Newcomb Journal: Cancer Causes Control Date: 2012-10-02 Impact factor: 2.506
Authors: Chuan He Yang; Junming Yue; Susan R Pfeffer; Meiyun Fan; Elena Paulus; Amira Hosni-Ahmed; Michelle Sims; Sohail Qayyum; Andrew M Davidoff; Charles R Handorf; Lawrence M Pfeffer Journal: J Biol Chem Date: 2014-07-24 Impact factor: 5.157
Authors: Richard M Goldberg; Daniel J Sargent; Roscoe F Morton; Erin Green; Hanna K Sanoff; Howard McLeod; Jan Buckner Journal: Oncologist Date: 2009-10-14