Literature DB >> 19073278

Genetic damage in subjects exposed to radiofrequency radiation.

Luc Verschaeve1.   

Abstract

Despite many research efforts and public debate there is still great concern about the possible adverse effects of radiofrequency (RF) radiation on human health. This is especially due to the enormous increase of wireless mobile telephones and other telecommunication devices throughout the world. The possible genetic effects of mobile phone radiation and other sources of radiofrequencies constitute one of the major points of concern. In the past several review papers were published on laboratory investigations that were devoted to in vitro and in vivo animal (cyto)genetic studies. However, it may be assumed that some of the most important observations are those obtained from studies with individuals that were exposed to relatively high levels of radiofrequency radiation, either as a result of their occupational activity or as frequent users of radiofrequency emitting tools. In this paper the cytogenetic biomonitoring studies of RF-exposed humans are reviewed. A majority of these studies do show that RF-exposed individuals have increased frequencies of genetic damage (e.g., chromosomal aberrations) in their lymphocytes or exfoliated buccal cells. However, most of the studies, if not all, have a number of shortcomings that actually prevents any firm conclusion. Radiation dosimetry was lacking in all papers, but some of the investigations were flawed by much more severe imperfections. Large well-coordinated multidisciplinary investigations are needed in order to reach any robust conclusion.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 19073278     DOI: 10.1016/j.mrrev.2008.11.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mutat Res        ISSN: 0027-5107            Impact factor:   2.433


  9 in total

1.  DNA Breathing Dynamics in the Presence of a Terahertz Field.

Authors:  B S Alexandrov; V Gelev; A R Bishop; A Usheva; K Ø Rasmussen
Journal:  Phys Lett A       Date:  2010-02-22       Impact factor: 2.654

2.  Effect of Base Transceiver Station (BTS) waves on some blood factors in domestic pigeons: an experimental study.

Authors:  Hesam Akbari; Sanaz Khoramipour; Seyed Kamal Eshagh Hossaini; Roya Mafigholami; Behnaz Moradighiasabadi
Journal:  J Environ Health Sci Eng       Date:  2021-10-18

3.  Study of oxidative stress in human lens epithelial cells exposed to 1.8 GHz radiofrequency fields.

Authors:  Shuang Ni; Yibo Yu; Yidong Zhang; Wei Wu; Kairan Lai; Ke Yao
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-08-26       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Circadian rhythmicity of antioxidant markers in rats exposed to 1.8 GHz radiofrequency fields.

Authors:  Honglong Cao; Fenju Qin; Xueguan Liu; Jiajun Wang; Yi Cao; Jian Tong; Heming Zhao
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2015-02-12       Impact factor: 3.390

Review 5.  International and national expert group evaluations: biological/health effects of radiofrequency fields.

Authors:  Maria R Scarfi
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2014-09-10       Impact factor: 3.390

6.  Remote biomonitoring of temperatures in mothers and newborns: design, development and testing of a wearable sensor device in a tertiary-care hospital in southern India.

Authors:  Prem K Mony; Prashanth Thankachan; Swarnarekha Bhat; Suman Rao; Maryann Washington; Sumi Antony; Annamma Thomas; Sheela C Nagarajarao; Hiteshwar Rao; Bharadwaj Amrutur
Journal:  BMJ Innov       Date:  2018-02-14

7.  Supervised Machine Learning Algorithms for Bioelectromagnetics: Prediction Models and Feature Selection Techniques Using Data from Weak Radiofrequency Radiation Effect on Human and Animals Cells.

Authors:  Malka N Halgamuge
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2020-06-26       Impact factor: 3.390

Review 8.  Pathophysiology of cell phone radiation: oxidative stress and carcinogenesis with focus on male reproductive system.

Authors:  Nisarg R Desai; Kavindra K Kesari; Ashok Agarwal
Journal:  Reprod Biol Endocrinol       Date:  2009-10-22       Impact factor: 5.211

Review 9.  Real versus Simulated Mobile Phone Exposures in Experimental Studies.

Authors:  Dimitris J Panagopoulos; Olle Johansson; George L Carlo
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2015-08-05       Impact factor: 3.411

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.