Literature DB >> 19072992

National benchmarking between the Nordic countries on the quality of care.

Jan Mainz1, Morten Hjulsager, Mette Thorup Eriksen Og, Jytte Burgaard.   

Abstract

This paper describes the Nordic Indicator Project that aims at describing and analysing the quality of care for important diseases in the Nordic countries (Denmark, Finland, Greenland, Iceland, Norway and Sweden). The Council of Ministers decided to appoint a working group for quality mapping with the aim of giving Nordic citizens, politicians, health workers and authorities the opportunity to evaluate and compare performance across the Nordic countries. The working group selected 36 prioritised quality indicators, including cancer indicators, for benchmarking between the Nordic countries. Additionally, 40 'potential indicators' have been identified for future developments. This international projects document how difficult it is to do international benchmarking. The experience of the Nordic Council of Ministers Quality Project has shown that even for common indicators as survival and mortality rates for breast cancer, colorectal cancer and lung cancer etc., it is difficult to yield data that are representative to the international nations as a whole. It seems that modern health care systems are not able do document their quality. At national and international level we need to invest in quality measurement systems and in international collaboration.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19072992     DOI: 10.1002/jso.21204

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Surg Oncol        ISSN: 0022-4790            Impact factor:   3.454


  8 in total

Review 1.  The interface of primary and oncology specialty care: from symptoms to diagnosis.

Authors:  Larissa Nekhlyudov; Steven Latosinsky
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr       Date:  2010

Review 2.  Benchmarking: a method for continuous quality improvement in health.

Authors:  Amina Ettorchi-Tardy; Marie Levif; Philippe Michel
Journal:  Healthc Policy       Date:  2012-05

3.  The Victorian Lung Cancer Registry pilot: improving the quality of lung cancer care through the use of a disease quality registry.

Authors:  Rob G Stirling; S M Evans; P McLaughlin; M Senthuren; J Millar; J Gooi; L Irving; P Mitchell; A Haydon; J Ruben; M Conron; T Leong; N Watkins; J J McNeil
Journal:  Lung       Date:  2014-06-08       Impact factor: 2.584

4.  Composite neonatal morbidity indicators using hospital discharge data: A systematic review.

Authors:  Elodie Lebreton; Catherine Crenn-Hébert; Claudie Menguy; Elizabeth A Howell; Jeffrey B Gould; Agnès Dechartres; Jennifer Zeitlin
Journal:  Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol       Date:  2020-03-23       Impact factor: 3.980

Review 5.  Benchmarking specialty hospitals, a scoping review on theory and practice.

Authors:  A Wind; W H van Harten
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2017-04-04       Impact factor: 2.655

6.  A visual summary of the EUROCARE-4 results: a UK perspective.

Authors:  H Møller; K M Linklater; D Robinson
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2009-12-03       Impact factor: 7.640

7.  Using relative survival measures for cross-sectional and longitudinal benchmarks of countries, states, and districts: the BenchRelSurv- and BenchRelSurvPlot-macros.

Authors:  Christian O Jacke; Iris Reinhard; Ute S Albert
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2013-01-14       Impact factor: 3.295

Review 8.  Benchmarking facilities providing care: An international overview of initiatives.

Authors:  Frédérique Thonon; Jonathan Watson; Mahasti Saghatchian
Journal:  SAGE Open Med       Date:  2015-09-23
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.