Literature DB >> 19072298

Common pharmacophore identification using frequent clique detection algorithm.

Yevgeniy Podolyan1, George Karypis.   

Abstract

The knowledge of a pharmacophore, or the 3D arrangement of features in the biologically active molecule that is responsible for its pharmacological activity, can help in the search and design of a new or better drug acting upon the same or related target. In this paper, we describe two new algorithms based on the frequent clique detection in the molecular graphs. The first algorithm mines all frequent cliques that are present in at least one of the conformers of each (or a portion of all) molecules. The second algorithm exploits the similarities among the different conformers of the same molecule and achieves an order of magnitude performance speedup compared to the first algorithm. Both algorithms are guaranteed to find all common pharmacophores in the data set, which is confirmed by the validation on the set of molecules for which pharmacophores have been determined experimentally. In addition, these algorithms are able to scale to data sets with arbitrarily large number of conformers per molecule and identify multiple ligand binding modes or multiple binding sites of the target.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19072298      PMCID: PMC2631088          DOI: 10.1021/ci8002478

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Chem Inf Model        ISSN: 1549-9596            Impact factor:   4.956


  10 in total

1.  Non-peptide angiotensin II receptor antagonists: chemical feature based pharmacophore identification.

Authors:  Eva M Krovat; Thierry Langer
Journal:  J Med Chem       Date:  2003-02-27       Impact factor: 7.446

2.  Can we separate active from inactive conformations?

Authors:  David J Diller; Kenneth M Merz
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 3.686

3.  PHASE: a new engine for pharmacophore perception, 3D QSAR model development, and 3D database screening: 1. Methodology and preliminary results.

Authors:  Steven L Dixon; Alexander M Smondyrev; Eric H Knoll; Shashidhar N Rao; David E Shaw; Richard A Friesner
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2006-11-24       Impact factor: 3.686

4.  PharmID: pharmacophore identification using Gibbs sampling.

Authors:  Jun Feng; Ashish Sanil; S Stanley Young
Journal:  J Chem Inf Model       Date:  2006 May-Jun       Impact factor: 4.956

5.  Recursive distance partitioning algorithm for common pharmacophore identification.

Authors:  Fangqiang Zhu; Dimitris K Agrafiotis
Journal:  J Chem Inf Model       Date:  2007-06-05       Impact factor: 4.956

6.  Identification of common functional configurations among molecules.

Authors:  D Barnum; J Greene; A Smellie; P Sprague
Journal:  J Chem Inf Comput Sci       Date:  1996 May-Jun

7.  Conformational changes of small molecules binding to proteins.

Authors:  M C Nicklaus; S Wang; J S Driscoll; G W Milne
Journal:  Bioorg Med Chem       Date:  1995-04       Impact factor: 3.641

8.  A genetic algorithm for flexible molecular overlay and pharmacophore elucidation.

Authors:  G Jones; P Willett; R C Glen
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  1995-12       Impact factor: 3.686

9.  A fast new approach to pharmacophore mapping and its application to dopaminergic and benzodiazepine agonists.

Authors:  Y C Martin; M G Bures; E A Danaher; J DeLazzer; I Lico; P A Pavlik
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  1993-02       Impact factor: 3.686

10.  A 3D QSAR study on a set of dopamine D4 receptor antagonists.

Authors:  Jonas Boström; Markus Böhm; Klaus Gundertofte; Gerhard Klebe
Journal:  J Chem Inf Comput Sci       Date:  2003 May-Jun
  10 in total
  4 in total

1.  Novel approach for efficient pharmacophore-based virtual screening: method and applications.

Authors:  Oranit Dror; Dina Schneidman-Duhovny; Yuval Inbar; Ruth Nussinov; Haim J Wolfson
Journal:  J Chem Inf Model       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 4.956

2.  IVSPlat 1.0: an integrated virtual screening platform with a molecular graphical interface.

Authors:  Yin Xue Sun; Yan Xin Huang; Feng Li Li; Hong Yan Wang; Cong Fan; Yong Li Bao; Lu Guo Sun; Zhi Qiang Ma; Jun Kong; Yu Xin Li
Journal:  Chem Cent J       Date:  2012-01-05       Impact factor: 4.215

Review 3.  Current computational methods for predicting protein interactions of natural products.

Authors:  Aurélien F A Moumbock; Jianyu Li; Pankaj Mishra; Mingjie Gao; Stefan Günther
Journal:  Comput Struct Biotechnol J       Date:  2019-10-28       Impact factor: 7.271

4.  The use of MoStBioDat for rapid screening of molecular diversity.

Authors:  Andrzej Bak; Jaroslaw Polanski; Agata Kurczyk
Journal:  Molecules       Date:  2009-09-08       Impact factor: 4.411

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.