Literature DB >> 19071169

Perceived healthiness of food. If it's healthy, you can eat more!

Véronique Provencher1, Janet Polivy, C Peter Herman.   

Abstract

The main aim of this study was to investigate the effects of food-related beliefs about the healthiness of foods, restrained eating, and weight salience on actual food intake during an ad libitum snack. In a 2 (healthy vs. unhealthy) by 2 (restrained vs. unrestrained eaters) by 2 (weight salient vs. not salient) factorial design, 99 female undergraduate students were invited to taste and rate oatmeal-raisin cookies. Dietary restraint and weight salience did not influence snack intake, but participants ate about 35% more when the snack was regarded as healthy than when it was seen as unhealthy. Ratings of the snack food's "healthiness," "capacity to affect weight" and "appropriateness in a healthy menu" also indicated that the "healthy" manipulation was effective. In addition, the "weight salience" manipulation appears to influence perceptions about food differently in restrained versus unrestrained eaters, in that restrained eaters rated the snack food more negatively than unrestrained eaters did when they received weight feedback before eating. Beliefs about the healthiness of foods may thus be of great relevance to both food intake and weight gain.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 19071169     DOI: 10.1016/j.appet.2008.11.005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Appetite        ISSN: 0195-6663            Impact factor:   3.868


  33 in total

Review 1.  Impact of Perceived Healthiness of Food on Food Choices and Intake.

Authors:  Véronique Provencher; Raphaëlle Jacob
Journal:  Curr Obes Rep       Date:  2016-03

Review 2.  Restrained Eating and Food Cues: Recent Findings and Conclusions.

Authors:  Janet Polivy; C Peter Herman
Journal:  Curr Obes Rep       Date:  2017-03

3.  Disentangling orthorexia nervosa from healthy eating and other eating disorder symptoms: Relationships with clinical impairment, comorbidity, and self-reported food choices.

Authors:  Hana F Zickgraf; Jordan M Ellis; Jamal H Essayli
Journal:  Appetite       Date:  2018-12-10       Impact factor: 3.868

4.  Reference amounts utilised in front of package nutrition labelling; impact on product healthfulness evaluations.

Authors:  M M Raats; S Hieke; C Jola; C Hodgkins; J Kennedy; J Wills
Journal:  Eur J Clin Nutr       Date:  2014-11-05       Impact factor: 4.016

5.  Front-of-pack nutrition label stimulates healthier product development: a quantitative analysis.

Authors:  Ellis L Vyth; Ingrid Hm Steenhuis; Annet Jc Roodenburg; Johannes Brug; Jacob C Seidell
Journal:  Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act       Date:  2010-09-08       Impact factor: 6.457

6.  Evaluating and communicating about the healthiness of foods: Predictors of parents' judgments and parent-child conversations.

Authors:  David Menendez; Matthew J Jiang; Kaitlin M Edwards; Karl S Rosengren; Martha W Alibali
Journal:  Cogn Dev       Date:  2020-06-26

7.  "Healthy"/"Unhealthy" Food Brands Influence Health, Calorie, and Price Ratings of Food.

Authors:  Travis D Masterson; Caterina Florissi; Kimberly R Clark; Diane Gilbert-Diamond
Journal:  J Nutr Educ Behav       Date:  2020-02-19       Impact factor: 3.045

Review 8.  Artificial sweeteners and metabolic dysregulation: Lessons learned from agriculture and the laboratory.

Authors:  Jane Shearer; Susan E Swithers
Journal:  Rev Endocr Metab Disord       Date:  2016-06       Impact factor: 6.514

9.  Increasing Vegetable Intake by Emphasizing Tasty and Enjoyable Attributes: A Randomized Controlled Multisite Intervention for Taste-Focused Labeling.

Authors:  Bradley P Turnwald; Jaclyn D Bertoldo; Margaret A Perry; Peggy Policastro; Maureen Timmons; Christopher Bosso; Priscilla Connors; Robert T Valgenti; Lindsey Pine; Ghislaine Challamel; Christopher D Gardner; Alia J Crum
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2019-10-02

Review 10.  Does food marketing need to make us fat? A review and solutions.

Authors:  Pierre Chandon; Brian Wansink
Journal:  Nutr Rev       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 6.846

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.