Literature DB >> 19070503

Data from a national lung cancer registry contributes to improve outcome and quality of surgery: Danish results.

Erik Jakobsen1, Torben Palshof, Kell Osterlind, Hans Pilegaard.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: In 1998 The Danish Lung Cancer Group published the first edition of guidelines for diagnosis and treatment of lung cancer. A national registry was implemented in the year 2000 with the primary objective to monitor the implementation of these guidelines and nationwide to secure and improve the quality of the clinical management of lung cancer. The results of this effort are reported with special focus on surgery.
METHODS: Through systematic nationwide registration a total of 24,153 patients have been included in the period 2000-2007. Indicators describing staging, surgical procedures, complications and survival have been registered in those 5007 patients who underwent surgery. Using an Internet based closed circle with a safe program (firewall and encryptation) more than 95% of this subgroup of patients have been notified. Each year the results have been audited locally, regionally and nationally and improvements have been proposed, implemented, monitored and consecutively evaluated by the audit-plenary.
RESULTS: This strategy has been a contributory factor to significantly improve the results in mortality, survival and surgical procedures. Thus, the 30-days mortality following surgery has decreased from 5.2% to 3.6% and survival has increased from an overall 1- and 2-year survival of 69% and 50% in 2000 to 77% and 60% in 2007, respectively. A number of other key indicators were also improved: the lobectomy rate has increased from 54% to 73% and the pneumonectomy rate has decreased from 23% to 11%. The proportion of patients having surgery within 14 days from referral has increased from 69% to 87%.
CONCLUSIONS: Establishment of a national lung cancer group with the primary tasks to implement updated national guidelines and to secure valid registration of clinical baseline data and quality parameters has been a contributory factor to significantly improve the quality of lung cancer surgery.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 19070503     DOI: 10.1016/j.ejcts.2008.09.026

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Cardiothorac Surg        ISSN: 1010-7940            Impact factor:   4.191


  21 in total

1.  A comprehensive stroke center patient registry: advantages, limitations, and lessons learned.

Authors:  James E Siegler; Amelia K Boehme; Adrianne M Dorsey; Dominique J Monlezun; Alex J George; Amir Shaban; H Jeremy Bockholt; Karen C Albright; Sheryl Martin-Schild
Journal:  Med Student Res J       Date:  2013-05-31

2.  Clinical quality registries: engaging effectiveness data for quality improvement.

Authors:  Rob G Stirling
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2014-10-16       Impact factor: 9.308

3.  The Victorian Lung Cancer Registry pilot: improving the quality of lung cancer care through the use of a disease quality registry.

Authors:  Rob G Stirling; S M Evans; P McLaughlin; M Senthuren; J Millar; J Gooi; L Irving; P Mitchell; A Haydon; J Ruben; M Conron; T Leong; N Watkins; J J McNeil
Journal:  Lung       Date:  2014-06-08       Impact factor: 2.584

4.  Successful thrombolysis of major pulmonary embolism 5 days after lobectomy.

Authors:  Jens Eckardt; Peter B Licht
Journal:  Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg       Date:  2012-02-15

5.  Lung cancer treatment disparities in China: a question in need of an answer.

Authors:  Lu-Lu Yang; Xu-Chao Zhang; Xue-Ning Yang; Jin-Ji Yang; Zhen Wang; Hua-Jun Chen; Hong-Hong Yan; Chong-Rui Xu; Ji-Lin Guan; Yan-Yan He; Wen-Zhao Zhong; She-Juan An; Yi-Long Wu
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2014-09-15

6.  National quality registries: how to improve the quality of data?

Authors:  Fieke Hoeijmakers; Naomi Beck; Michel W J M Wouters; Hubert A Prins; Willem H Steup
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2018-10       Impact factor: 2.895

7.  Lessons learned from the Dutch Institute for Clinical Auditing: the Dutch model for quality assurance in lung cancer treatment.

Authors:  Naomi Beck; Fieke Hoeijmakers; Erwin M Wiegman; Hans J M Smit; Franz M Schramel; Willem H Steup; Ad F T M Verhagen; Wilhelmina H Schreurs; Michel W J M Wouters
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2018-10       Impact factor: 2.895

8.  Socioeconomic position, stage of lung cancer and time between referral and diagnosis in Denmark, 2001-2008.

Authors:  S O Dalton; B L Frederiksen; E Jacobsen; M Steding-Jessen; K Østerlind; J Schüz; M Osler; C Johansen
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2011-09-06       Impact factor: 7.640

9.  SUPPORT tools for evidence-informed policymaking in health 18: Planning monitoring and evaluation of policies.

Authors:  Atle Fretheim; Andrew D Oxman; John N Lavis; Simon Lewin
Journal:  Health Res Policy Syst       Date:  2009-12-16

10.  The direct and indirect impact of comorbidity on the survival of patients with non-small cell lung cancer: a combination of survival, staging and resection models with missing measurements in covariates.

Authors:  Maria Iachina; Anders Green; Erik Jakobsen
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2014-02-12       Impact factor: 2.692

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.