Literature DB >> 19069610

Research priorities in suicide prevention in Australia. A comparison of current research efforts and stakeholder-identified priorities.

Jo Robinson1, Jane Pirkis, Karolina Krysinska, Sara Niner, Anthony F Jorm, Michael Dudley, Emily Schindeler, Diego De Leo, Susy Harrigan.   

Abstract

This project sought to inform priority setting in Australian suicide prevention research, by empirically examining existing priorities and by seeking stakeholders' views on where future priorities might lie. Existing priorities were examined via reviews of Australian literature published and grants funded during the life of the National Suicide Prevention Strategy (1999-2006). Stakeholders' views of future priorities were elicited via a questionnaire administered to 11 groups comprising 231 individuals with an interest in suicide prevention. The study identified 263 journal articles and 36 grants. The journal articles most commonly reported on studies of descriptive epidemiology, while the grants tended to fund intervention studies. Both gave roughly equal weight to completed and attempted suicide, and gave little emphasis to studies of suicide methods. Young people were the most frequently-researched target group, with people with mental health problems and people who had attempted suicide or deliberately self-harmed also receiving attention. Stakeholders indicated that emphasis should be given to intervention studies, and that completed suicide and attempted suicide are both important. In terms of suicide method, they felt the focus should be on poisoning by drugs and hanging. They had mixed views about the target groups that should be afforded priority, although young people and people with mental health problems were frequently ranked highly. This paper presents a picture of the current focus with regard to suicide prevention research, identifying some areas where there are clear gaps and others where relatively greater efforts have been made. By combining this information with stakeholders' views of where future priorities should lie, the paper provides some guidance as to the shape a future suicide prevention research agenda for Australia should take. A strategic approach to suicide prevention research will help fill internationally-identified gaps in knowledge about what works and what doesn't work in suicide prevention.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 19069610     DOI: 10.1027/0227-5910.29.4.180

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Crisis        ISSN: 0227-5910


  7 in total

1.  Social media and suicide prevention: findings from a stakeholder survey.

Authors:  Jo Robinson; Maria Rodrigues; Steve Fisher; Eleanor Bailey; Helen Herrman
Journal:  Shanghai Arch Psychiatry       Date:  2015-02-25

2.  Effect of phone call versus face-to-face follow-up on recurrent suicide attempts prevention in individuals with a history of multiple suicide attempts.

Authors:  Seyed Ghafur Mousavi; Mohsen Amini; Behzad Mahaki; Reza Bagherian-Sararoudi
Journal:  Adv Biomed Res       Date:  2016-11-28

3.  Research Priorities in Suicide Prevention: Review of Australian Research from 2010⁻2017 Highlights Continued Need for Intervention Research.

Authors:  Lennart Reifels; Maria Ftanou; Karolina Krysinska; Anna Machlin; Jo Robinson; Jane Pirkis
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2018-04-20       Impact factor: 3.390

4.  Identifying Research Gaps and Prioritizing Psychological Health Evidence Synthesis Needs.

Authors:  Susanne Hempel; Kristie Gore; Bradley Belsher
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2019-10       Impact factor: 2.983

5.  Trends in suicide-related research in Australia.

Authors:  Marisa Schlichthorst; Lennart Reifels; Karolina Krysinska; Maria Ftanou; Anna Machlin; Jo Robinson; Jane Pirkis
Journal:  Int J Ment Health Syst       Date:  2020-01-10

6.  Study protocol: the development of a randomised controlled trial testing a postcard intervention designed to reduce suicide risk among young help-seekers.

Authors:  Jo Robinson; Sarah Hetrick; Sara Gook; Elizabeth Cosgrave; Hok Pan Yuen; Patrick McGorry; Alison Yung
Journal:  BMC Psychiatry       Date:  2009-09-23       Impact factor: 3.630

7.  The development of a randomised controlled trial testing the effects of an online intervention among school students at risk of suicide.

Authors:  Jo Robinson; Sarah Hetrick; Georgina Cox; Sarah Bendall; Alison Yung; Hok Pan Yuen; Kate Templer; Jane Pirkis
Journal:  BMC Psychiatry       Date:  2014-05-27       Impact factor: 3.630

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.