Literature DB >> 19068829

Discrimination of plant volatile signatures by an electronic nose: aA potential technology for plant pest and disease monitoring.

Jullada Laothawornkitkul1, Jason P Moore, Jane E Taylor, Malcolm Possell, Tim D Gibson, C Nicholas Hewitt, Nigel D Paul.   

Abstract

The volatile organic compounds (VOCs) profile emitted from plants often changes in response to environmental factors, and monitoring the change of such profiles could provide a nondestructive means of plant health measurement An electronic nose (e-nose) was used to discriminate among VOC bouquets emitted by cucumber, pepper, and tomato leaves subjected to mechanical damage or pest and disease attacks compared with undamaged control leaves. Principle component analysis, discriminant function analysis, and cluster analysis were applied to evaluate the data. The results indicate that the e-nose can discriminate among VOCs from undamaged leaves of the three tested species. It can also discriminate undamaged and artificially damaged leaves of the same plant species. In cucumber, the e-nose can discriminate among VOCs emitted from control, artificially damaged, and spider-mite-infested leaves. It could also discriminate among VOCs emitted from control, artificially damaged, hornworm-damaged, and powdery-mildew-infected tomato leaves. The relationships between the changes in volatile signatures detected by the e-nose to changes in the underlying chemistry of plant VOC signatures in response to applied stresses were quantified by gas chromatography mass spectrometry. We conclude that the e-nose had genuine responses to changes in plant VOC signatures and can successfully discriminate them. These studies demonstrate the potential use of such e-nose technology as a real time pest and disease monitoring system in agricultural and horticultural settings.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 19068829     DOI: 10.1021/es801738s

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Sci Technol        ISSN: 0013-936X            Impact factor:   9.028


  13 in total

Review 1.  Induced plant volatiles allow sensitive monitoring of plant health status in greenhouses.

Authors:  Roel M C Jansen; Jan W Hofstee; Jürgen Wildt; Francel W A Verstappen; Harro J Bouwmeester; Eldert J van Henten
Journal:  Plant Signal Behav       Date:  2009-09-24

Review 2.  Potential Applications and Limitations of Electronic Nose Devices for Plant Disease Diagnosis.

Authors:  Antonio Cellini; Sonia Blasioli; Enrico Biondi; Assunta Bertaccini; Ilaria Braschi; Francesco Spinelli
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2017-11-11       Impact factor: 3.576

3.  SPME-based mobile field device for active sampling of volatiles.

Authors:  Alexander G Fung; Mei S Yamaguchi; Mitchell M McCartney; Alexander A Aksenov; Alberto Pasamontes; Cristina E Davis
Journal:  Microchem J       Date:  2019-01-05       Impact factor: 4.821

Review 4.  Diverse applications of electronic-nose technologies in agriculture and forestry.

Authors:  Alphus D Wilson
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2013-02-08       Impact factor: 3.576

5.  The volatile compound BinBase mass spectral database.

Authors:  Kirsten Skogerson; Gert Wohlgemuth; Dinesh K Barupal; Oliver Fiehn
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2011-08-04       Impact factor: 3.169

6.  Smart sensor for real-time quantification of common symptoms present in unhealthy plants.

Authors:  Luis M Contreras-Medina; Roque A Osornio-Rios; Irineo Torres-Pacheco; Rene de J Romero-Troncoso; Ramon G Guevara-González; Jesus R Millan-Almaraz
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2012-01-11       Impact factor: 3.576

7.  Volatilomics: a non-invasive technique for screening plant phenotypic traits.

Authors:  Werner Jud; J Barbro Winkler; Bishu Niederbacher; Simon Niederbacher; Jörg-Peter Schnitzler
Journal:  Plant Methods       Date:  2018-12-18       Impact factor: 4.993

8.  The effect of ozone fumigation on the biogenic volatile organic compounds (BVOCs) emitted from Brassica napus above- and below-ground.

Authors:  W J F Acton; W Jud; A Ghirardo; G Wohlfahrt; C N Hewitt; J E Taylor; A Hansel
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-12-10       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Canine olfactory detection of a vectored phytobacterial pathogen, Liberibacter asiaticus, and integration with disease control.

Authors:  Timothy Gottwald; Gavin Poole; Thomas McCollum; David Hall; John Hartung; Jinhe Bai; Weiqi Luo; Drew Posny; Yong-Ping Duan; Earl Taylor; John da Graça; MaryLou Polek; Frank Louws; William Schneider
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2020-02-03       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 10.  Plant Pest Detection Using an Artificial Nose System: A Review.

Authors:  Shaoqing Cui; Peter Ling; Heping Zhu; Harold M Keener
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2018-01-28       Impact factor: 3.576

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.