Literature DB >> 19068275

Cancer clinical trial outcomes: any progress in tumour-size assessment?

Jaap Verweij1, Patrick Therasse, Elizabeth Eisenhauer.   

Abstract

Cancer for many patients is still a lethal disease, and we are at the edge of the time that it will be the leading cause of death in the western world. One of the hallmarks of cancer is its ability to spread to other organs, turning cancer in essence to a systemic disease. For this reason, systemic therapy plays an important role in our efforts to either obtain cure or to prolong life and palliate symptoms. The ultimate goal in the development of such new treatments is cure or prolongation of life, but the process to ascertain this may be lengthy. This presents a limitation to the rapid assessment of the potential benefit of new cancer treatments, which is why investigators and regulators have been interested in clinical trial measures that could provide early readouts of drug activity or efficacy, in other words for surrogate indicators for the ultimately desired outcome.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 19068275     DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2008.10.025

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Cancer        ISSN: 0959-8049            Impact factor:   9.162


  11 in total

Review 1.  Moving molecular targeted drug therapy towards personalized medicine: issues related to clinical trial design.

Authors:  Jaap Verweij; Maja de Jonge; Ferry Eskens; Stefan Sleijfer
Journal:  Mol Oncol       Date:  2012-02-16       Impact factor: 6.603

Review 2.  Predicting and monitoring cancer treatment response with diffusion-weighted MRI.

Authors:  Harriet C Thoeny; Brian D Ross
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 4.813

Review 3.  RECIST - learning from the past to build the future.

Authors:  Saskia Litière; Sandra Collette; Elisabeth G E de Vries; Lesley Seymour; Jan Bogaerts
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2016-12-20       Impact factor: 66.675

Review 4.  Beyond Correlations, Sensitivities, and Specificities: A Roadmap for Demonstrating Utility of Advanced Imaging in Oncology Treatment and Clinical Trial Design.

Authors:  Erich P Huang; Frank I Lin; Lalitha K Shankar
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2017-04-26       Impact factor: 3.173

Review 5.  From RECIST to PERCIST: Evolving Considerations for PET response criteria in solid tumors.

Authors:  Richard L Wahl; Heather Jacene; Yvette Kasamon; Martin A Lodge
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 10.057

Review 6.  Issues surrounding clinical trial endpoints in solid malignancies with a focus on metastatic non-small cell lung cancer.

Authors:  Edward B Garon
Journal:  Lung Cancer       Date:  2012-07-12       Impact factor: 5.705

7.  How to study optimal timing of PET/CT for monitoring of cancer treatment.

Authors:  Werner Vach; Poul Flemming Høilund-Carlsen; Barbara Malene Fischer; Oke Gerke; Wolfgang Weber
Journal:  Am J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2011-07-20

8.  Preclinical multimodality phantom design for quality assurance of tumor size measurement.

Authors:  Yongsook C Lee; Gary D Fullerton; Cristel Baiu; Margaret G Lescrenier; Beth A Goins
Journal:  BMC Med Phys       Date:  2011-09-30

9.  Early MRI response monitoring of patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma under treatment with the multikinase inhibitor sorafenib.

Authors:  Marius Horger; Ulrich M Lauer; Christina Schraml; Christoph P Berg; Ursula Koppenhöfer; Claus D Claussen; Michael Gregor; Michael Bitzer
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2009-06-28       Impact factor: 4.430

10.  CD133+ circulating haematopoietic progenitor cells predict for response to sorafenib plus erlotinib in non-small cell lung cancer patients.

Authors:  L Vroling; J S W Lind; R R de Haas; H M W Verheul; V W M van Hinsbergh; H J Broxterman; E F Smit
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2009-12-15       Impact factor: 7.640

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.