Literature DB >> 19067650

Obtaining exposures of metabolites in preclinical species through plasma pooling and quantitative NMR: addressing metabolites in safety testing (MIST) guidance without using radiolabeled compounds and chemically synthesized metabolite standards.

Karthick Vishwanathan1, Kathlene Babalola, Jack Wang, Robert Espina, Linning Yu, Adedayo Adedoyin, Rasmy Talaat, Abdul Mutlib, JoAnn Scatina.   

Abstract

The recent guidance on "Safety Testing of Drug Metabolites" issued by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Center for Drug Evaluation and Research (CDER) has highlighted the importance of identifying and characterizing drug metabolites as early as possible in drug discovery and development. Furthermore, upon identifying significant circulating metabolites in human plasma, it has become important to demonstrate that these metabolites are present at an equal or greater exposure level (area under the curve, AUC) in any one of the preclinical species used in safety testing. Frequently, synthetic standards of metabolites are not available, and hence, obtaining their AUC values can be a challenge. In this report, we demonstrate how combinations of nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectroscopy, liquid chromatography/ultraviolet/mass spectrometry (LC/UV/MS), and plasma pooling methods were used to obtain reliable AUC values of metabolites present in the plasma of preclinical species from short-term safety studies. Plasma pooling methods were compared to the traditional approaches of obtaining quantitative information on the levels of circulating metabolites in preclinical species. The exposure values obtained via sample pooling were comparable to those obtained by traditional methods of analyzing samples individually. In the absence of synthetic chemical standards, calculations of AUC values of metabolites, using either sample pooling or traditional approaches, were achieved through the use of UV detectors. In cases where the UV properties of metabolites were significantly different from their parent compounds, NMR was used as a quantitative tool to obtain exposure values. NMR was found to be useful in quantitating biologically produced metabolites, which could subsequently be used as reference compounds for further quantitative studies. The limitations of UV detectors to obtain exposure estimates are discussed. A practical solution is presented that will enable us to obtain a quantitative assessment of metabolite exposure in humans and coverage in toxicology species, hence, circumventing the use of radiolabeled compounds or authentic chemically synthesized standards of metabolites.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19067650     DOI: 10.1021/tx8003328

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Chem Res Toxicol        ISSN: 0893-228X            Impact factor:   3.739


  10 in total

1.  Meeting report: metabolites in safety testing (MIST) symposium-safety assessment of human metabolites: what's REALLY necessary to ascertain exposure coverage in safety tests?

Authors:  Hongying Gao; Abigail Jacobs; Ronald E White; Brian P Booth; R Scott Obach
Journal:  AAPS J       Date:  2013-07-03       Impact factor: 4.009

2.  Small molecule quantification by liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry for metabolites of drugs and drug candidates.

Authors:  Upendra P Dahal; Jeffrey P Jones; John A Davis; Dan A Rock
Journal:  Drug Metab Dispos       Date:  2011-09-21       Impact factor: 3.922

Review 3.  Addressing the challenges of low clearance in drug research.

Authors:  Li Di; R Scott Obach
Journal:  AAPS J       Date:  2015-01-08       Impact factor: 4.009

4.  Conventional liquid chromatography/triple quadrupole mass spectrometry based metabolite identification and semi-quantitative estimation approach in the investigation of in vitro dabigatran etexilate metabolism.

Authors:  Zhe-Yi Hu; Robert B Parker; Vanessa L Herring; S Casey Laizure
Journal:  Anal Bioanal Chem       Date:  2012-12-14       Impact factor: 4.142

5.  Human absorption, distribution, metabolism and excretion properties of drug molecules: a plethora of approaches.

Authors:  Claire Beaumont; Graeme C Young; Tom Cavalier; Malcolm A Young
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 4.335

Review 6.  Universal quantitative NMR analysis of complex natural samples.

Authors:  Charlotte Simmler; José G Napolitano; James B McAlpine; Shao-Nong Chen; Guido F Pauli
Journal:  Curr Opin Biotechnol       Date:  2013-09-14       Impact factor: 9.740

Review 7.  Rationalization and prediction of in vivo metabolite exposures: the role of metabolite kinetics, clearance predictions and in vitro parameters.

Authors:  Justin D Lutz; Yasushi Fujioka; Nina Isoherranen
Journal:  Expert Opin Drug Metab Toxicol       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 4.481

Review 8.  Quantitative 1H NMR. Development and potential of an analytical method: an update.

Authors:  Guido F Pauli; Tanja Gödecke; Birgit U Jaki; David C Lankin
Journal:  J Nat Prod       Date:  2012-04-06       Impact factor: 4.050

9.  Detection of nanolevel drug metabolites in an organotypic culture of primary human hepatocytes and porcine hepatocytes with special reference to a two-compartment model.

Authors:  Ali Acikgöz; Shibashish Giri; Augustinus Bader
Journal:  Int J Nanomedicine       Date:  2012-11-27

10.  Significance of Competing Metabolic Pathways for 5F-APINACA Based on Quantitative Kinetics.

Authors:  Anna O Pinson; Dakota L Pouncey; Mary A Schleiff; William E Fantegrossi; Paul L Prather; Anna Radominska-Pandya; Gunnar Boysen; Grover P Miller
Journal:  Molecules       Date:  2020-10-20       Impact factor: 4.411

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.