Literature DB >> 19067515

Interfacial electron-transfer kinetics in metal-free organic dye-sensitized solar cells: combined effects of molecular structure of dyes and electrolytes.

Masanori Miyashita1, Kenji Sunahara, Tomohiro Nishikawa, Yu Uemura, Nagatoshi Koumura, Kohjiro Hara, Atsunori Mori, Takao Abe, Eiji Suzuki, Shogo Mori.   

Abstract

Electron diffusion coefficient, lifetime, and density in the TiO(2) electrode of dye-sensitized TiO(2) solar cells (DSCs) employing I(-)/I(3)(-) redox couples were measured with eight different metal-free organic dyes and three Ru complex dyes. At matched electron density, all DSCs using organic dyes (ODSCs) showed shorter electron lifetime with comparable or larger diffusion coefficients in comparison to the DSCs using the Ru dyes (RuDSC). The shorter lifetime was attributed partially to the slower dye cation reduction rate of the organic dyes by I(-), faster electron diffusion coefficient in the TiO(2), and mostly higher I(3)(-) concentration in the vicinity of the TiO(2) surface. Whereas a slight shift of the conduction band edge potential (E(cb)) of the TiO(2) was seen with a few organic dyes, no correlation was found with the dipole moment of the adsorbed dyes. This implies that the adsorbed dyes interact with cations in the electrolyte, so the direction of the dipole is altered or simply screened. The increase of [I(3)(-)] in the vicinity of the TiO(2) surface was interpreted with partial charge distribution of the dyes. Under one-sun conditions, less electron density due to shorter electron lifetime was found to be the main reason for the lower values of V(oc) for all ODSCs in comparison to that of RuDSCs. Among the organic dyes, having larger molecular size and alkyl chains showed longer electron lifetime, and thus higher V(oc). Toward higher open circuit voltage, a design guide of organic dyes controlling the electron lifetime is discussed.

Entities:  

Year:  2008        PMID: 19067515     DOI: 10.1021/ja803534u

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Chem Soc        ISSN: 0002-7863            Impact factor:   15.419


  4 in total

1.  Electrochemical Infilling of CuInSe2 within TiO2 Nanotube Layers and Subsequent Photoelectrochemical Studies.

Authors:  Sayantan Das; Hanna Sopha; Milos Krbal; Raul Zazpe; Veronika Podzemna; Jan Prikryl; Jan M Macak
Journal:  ChemElectroChem       Date:  2017-02-08       Impact factor: 4.590

2.  Ag8SnS6: a new IR solar absorber material with a near optimal bandgap.

Authors:  Patsorn Boon-On; Belete Asefa Aragaw; Chun-Yen Lee; Jen-Bin Shi; Ming-Way Lee
Journal:  RSC Adv       Date:  2018-11-26       Impact factor: 4.036

3.  Kelvin probe force microscopy of nanocrystalline TiO2 photoelectrodes.

Authors:  Alex Henning; Gino Günzburger; Res Jöhr; Yossi Rosenwaks; Biljana Bozic-Weber; Catherine E Housecroft; Edwin C Constable; Ernst Meyer; Thilo Glatzel
Journal:  Beilstein J Nanotechnol       Date:  2013-07-01       Impact factor: 3.649

4.  Enhancement of dye regeneration kinetics in dichromophoric porphyrin-carbazole triphenylamine dyes influenced by more exposed radical cation orbitals.

Authors:  Long Zhao; Pawel Wagner; Jonathan E Barnsley; Tracey M Clarke; Keith C Gordon; Shogo Mori; Attila J Mozer
Journal:  Chem Sci       Date:  2016-03-01       Impact factor: 9.825

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.