Literature DB >> 19067434

A quantitative comparison of metabolite signals as detected by in vivo MRS with ex vivo 1H HR-MAS for childhood brain tumours.

Martin Wilson1, Nigel P Davies, Richard G Grundy, Andrew C Peet.   

Abstract

(1)H MRS provides a powerful method for investigating tumour metabolism by allowing the measurement of metabolites in vivo. Recently, the technique of (1)H high-resolution magic angle spinning (HR-MAS) has been shown to produce high-quality data, allowing the accurate measurement of many metabolites present in unprocessed biopsy tissue. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the agreement between the techniques of in vivo MRS and ex vivo HR-MAS for investigating childhood brain tumours. Short-TE (30 ms), single-voxel, in vivo MRS was performed on 16 paediatric patients with brain tumours at 1.5 T. A frozen biopsy sample was available for each patient. HR-MAS was performed on the biopsy samples, and metabolite quantities were determined from the MRS and HR-MAS data using the LCModel and TARQUIN algorithms, respectively. Linear regression was performed on the metabolite quantities to asses the agreement between MRS and HR-MAS. Eight of the 12 metabolite quantities were found to correlate significantly (P < 0.05). The four worst correlating metabolites were aspartate, scyllo-inositol, glycerophosphocholine and N-acetylaspartate, and, except for glycerophosphocholine, this error was reflected in their higher Cramer-Rao lower bounds (CRLBs), suggesting that low signal-to-noise was the greatest source of error for these metabolites. Glycerophosphocholine had a lower CRLB implying that interference with phosphocholine and choline was the most significant source of error. The generally good agreement observed between the two techniques suggests that both MRS and HR-MAS can be used to reliably estimate metabolite quantities in brain tumour tissue and that tumour heterogeneity and metabolite degradation do not have an important effect on the HR-MAS metabolite profile for the tumours investigated. HR-MAS can be used to improve the analysis and understanding of MRS data. Copyright (c) 2009 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19067434     DOI: 10.1002/nbm.1306

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  NMR Biomed        ISSN: 0952-3480            Impact factor:   4.044


  18 in total

1.  Chemical mapping of the colorectal cancer microenvironment via MALDI imaging mass spectrometry (MALDI-MSI) reveals novel cancer-associated field effects.

Authors:  R Mirnezami; K Spagou; P A Vorkas; M R Lewis; J Kinross; E Want; H Shion; R D Goldin; A Darzi; Z Takats; E Holmes; O Cloarec; J K Nicholson
Journal:  Mol Oncol       Date:  2013-09-14       Impact factor: 6.603

Review 2.  Applications of high-resolution magic angle spinning MRS in biomedical studies II-Human diseases.

Authors:  Christopher Dietz; Felix Ehret; Francesco Palmas; Lindsey A Vandergrift; Yanni Jiang; Vanessa Schmitt; Vera Dufner; Piet Habbel; Johannes Nowak; Leo L Cheng
Journal:  NMR Biomed       Date:  2017-09-15       Impact factor: 4.044

3.  High-resolution magic angle spinning NMR spectroscopy of human osteoarthritic cartilage.

Authors:  Keerthi Shet; Sarmad M Siddiqui; Hikari Yoshihara; John Kurhanewicz; Michael Ries; Xiaojuan Li
Journal:  NMR Biomed       Date:  2011-08-18       Impact factor: 4.044

4.  Can nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectroscopy reveal different metabolic signatures for lung tumours?

Authors:  Iola F Duarte; Cláudia M Rocha; António S Barros; Ana M Gil; Brian J Goodfellow; Isabel M Carreira; João Bernardo; Ana Gomes; Vitor Sousa; Lina Carvalho
Journal:  Virchows Arch       Date:  2010-10-13       Impact factor: 4.064

5.  Ex-vivo HRMAS of adult brain tumours: metabolite quantification and assignment of tumour biomarkers.

Authors:  Alan J Wright; Greg A Fellows; John R Griffiths; M Wilson; B Anthony Bell; Franklyn A Howe
Journal:  Mol Cancer       Date:  2010-03-23       Impact factor: 27.401

Review 6.  Using magnetic resonance imaging and spectroscopy in cancer diagnostics and monitoring: preclinical and clinical approaches.

Authors:  Risto A Kauppinen; Andrew C Peet
Journal:  Cancer Biol Ther       Date:  2011-10-15       Impact factor: 4.742

7.  Spermine and citrate as metabolic biomarkers for assessing prostate cancer aggressiveness.

Authors:  Guro F Giskeødegård; Helena Bertilsson; Kirsten M Selnæs; Alan J Wright; Tone F Bathen; Trond Viset; Jostein Halgunset; Anders Angelsen; Ingrid S Gribbestad; May-Britt Tessem
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-04-23       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Panorganismal metabolic response modeling of an experimental Echinostoma caproni infection in the mouse.

Authors:  Jasmina Saric; Jia V Li; Yulan Wang; Jennifer Keiser; Kirill Veselkov; Stephan Dirnhofer; Ivan K S Yap; Jeremy K Nicholson; Elaine Holmes; Jürg Utzinger
Journal:  J Proteome Res       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 4.466

9.  ¹H nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy characterisation of metabolic phenotypes in the medulloblastoma of the SMO transgenic mice.

Authors:  S K Hekmatyar; M Wilson; N Jerome; R M Salek; J L Griffin; A Peet; R A Kauppinen
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2010-09-14       Impact factor: 7.640

10.  Noninvasive detection of glutamate predicts survival in pediatric medulloblastoma.

Authors:  Martin Wilson; Simrandip K Gill; Lesley MacPherson; Martin English; Theodoros N Arvanitis; Andrew C Peet
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2014-06-19       Impact factor: 12.531

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.