OBJECT: The PASADENA method has achieved hyperpolarization of 16-20% (exceeding 40,000-fold signal enhancement at 4.7 T), in liquid samples of biological molecules relevant to in vivo MRI and MRS. However, there exists no commercial apparatus to perform this experiment conveniently and reproducibly on the routine basis necessary for translation of PASADENA to questions of biomedical importance. The present paper describes equipment designed for rapid production of six to eight liquid samples per hour with high reproducibility of hyperpolarization. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Drawing on an earlier, but unpublished, prototype, we provide diagrams of a delivery circuit, a laminar-flow reaction chamber within a low field NMR contained in a compact, movable housing. Assembly instructions are provided from which a computer driven, semi-automated PASADENA polarizer can be constructed. RESULTS: Together with an available parahydrogen generator, the polarizer, which can be operated by a single investigator, completes one cycle of hyperpolarization each 52 s. Evidence of efficacy is presented. In contrast to competing, commercially available devices for dynamic nuclear polarization which characteristically require 90 min per cycle, PASADENA provides a low-cost alternative for high throughput. CONCLUSIONS: This equipment is suited to investigators who have an established small animal NMR and wish to explore the potential of heteronuclear ((13)C and (15)N) MRI, MRS, which harnesses the enormous sensitivity gain offered by hyperpolarization.
OBJECT: The PASADENA method has achieved hyperpolarization of 16-20% (exceeding 40,000-fold signal enhancement at 4.7 T), in liquid samples of biological molecules relevant to in vivo MRI and MRS. However, there exists no commercial apparatus to perform this experiment conveniently and reproducibly on the routine basis necessary for translation of PASADENA to questions of biomedical importance. The present paper describes equipment designed for rapid production of six to eight liquid samples per hour with high reproducibility of hyperpolarization. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Drawing on an earlier, but unpublished, prototype, we provide diagrams of a delivery circuit, a laminar-flow reaction chamber within a low field NMR contained in a compact, movable housing. Assembly instructions are provided from which a computer driven, semi-automated PASADENA polarizer can be constructed. RESULTS: Together with an available parahydrogen generator, the polarizer, which can be operated by a single investigator, completes one cycle of hyperpolarization each 52 s. Evidence of efficacy is presented. In contrast to competing, commercially available devices for dynamic nuclear polarization which characteristically require 90 min per cycle, PASADENA provides a low-cost alternative for high throughput. CONCLUSIONS: This equipment is suited to investigators who have an established small animal NMR and wish to explore the potential of heteronuclear ((13)C and (15)N) MRI, MRS, which harnesses the enormous sensitivity gain offered by hyperpolarization.
Authors: P Bhattacharya; K Harris; A P Lin; M Mansson; V A Norton; W H Perman; D P Weitekamp; B D Ross Journal: MAGMA Date: 2005-11-23 Impact factor: 2.310
Authors: Louis-S Bouchard; Scott R Burt; M Sabieh Anwar; Kirill V Kovtunov; Igor V Koptyug; Alexander Pines Journal: Science Date: 2008-01-25 Impact factor: 47.728
Authors: Jan H Ardenkjaer-Larsen; Björn Fridlund; Andreas Gram; Georg Hansson; Lennart Hansson; Mathilde H Lerche; Rolf Servin; Mikkel Thaning; Klaes Golman Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2003-08-20 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Eduard Y Chekmenev; Jan Hövener; Valerie A Norton; Kent Harris; Lynne S Batchelder; Pratip Bhattacharya; Brian D Ross; Daniel P Weitekamp Journal: J Am Chem Soc Date: 2008-03-12 Impact factor: 15.419
Authors: Danila A Barskiy; Kirill V Kovtunov; Igor V Koptyug; Ping He; Kirsten A Groome; Quinn A Best; Fan Shi; Boyd M Goodson; Roman V Shchepin; Milton L Truong; Aaron M Coffey; Kevin W Waddell; Eduard Y Chekmenev Journal: Chemphyschem Date: 2014-11-03 Impact factor: 3.102
Authors: Niki M Zacharias; Henry R Chan; Napapon Sailasuta; Brian D Ross; Pratip Bhattacharya Journal: J Am Chem Soc Date: 2011-12-22 Impact factor: 15.419
Authors: Kirill V Kovtunov; Ekaterina V Pokochueva; Oleg G Salnikov; Samuel F Cousin; Dennis Kurzbach; Basile Vuichoud; Sami Jannin; Eduard Y Chekmenev; Boyd M Goodson; Danila A Barskiy; Igor V Koptyug Journal: Chem Asian J Date: 2018-05-23
Authors: Robert Borowiak; Niels Schwaderlapp; Frank Huethe; Thomas Lickert; Elmar Fischer; Sébastien Bär; Jürgen Hennig; Dominik von Elverfeldt; Jan-Bernd Hövener Journal: MAGMA Date: 2013-02-15 Impact factor: 2.310
Authors: Oleg G Salnikov; Roman V Shchepin; Nikita V Chukanov; Lamya Jaigirdar; Wellington Pham; Kirill V Kovtunov; Igor V Koptyug; Eduard Y Chekmenev Journal: J Phys Chem C Nanomater Interfaces Date: 2018-10-02 Impact factor: 4.126
Authors: Sarmad Siddiqui; Stephen Kadlecek; Mehrdad Pourfathi; Yi Xin; William Mannherz; Hooman Hamedani; Nicholas Drachman; Kai Ruppert; Justin Clapp; Rahim Rizi Journal: Adv Drug Deliv Rev Date: 2016-09-04 Impact factor: 15.470
Authors: Thomas Theis; Nuwandi M Ariyasingha; Roman V Shchepin; Jacob R Lindale; Warren S Warren; Eduard Y Chekmenev Journal: J Phys Chem Lett Date: 2018-10-10 Impact factor: 6.475